[continued from previous message]
>>> (our internal dialogue and transformative engagement) is reduced to a
>>> closed, static symbol: akin to a closed mouth represented by the
>>> closed letter [#56]. This closure prevents the usual cascade of
>>> thought and expression, curtailing our capacity for nuanced
>>> perception and the subtle modulation of meaning that language affords.
>>>
>>> The meta-descriptive codes you referenced illustrate this interplay.
>>> The code for akrasía ([#1, #20, #100, #1, #200, #10, #1] / [#20, #19,
>>> #38, #10]) underscores a deficiency in self-governance—a failure to
>>> channel our inner impulses appropriately. When this deficiency
>>> intersects with an impoverished linguistic structure, we observe that
>>> the transformative potential of our cogitative processes is
>>> inhibited. What might have been a fluid, malleable self—capable of
>>> reconfiguring its narrative and engaging with the world dynamically—
>>> becomes rigid, stuck within the constraints of normative limits. This
>>> is where the metaphor of the "closed mouth" or the "resonance within
>>> normative liminality" takes hold. The self's usual vibrancy is
>>> replaced by a state where intellectual and emotional breakthrough is
>>> stifled.
>>>
>>> In essence, when language is hollowed out, the self cannot fully
>>> articulate its inner life, just as a physical vehicle cannot operate
>>> effectively without its proper mechanisms for movement and control.
>>> The relationship between LINGUISTIC RICHNESS and self-control becomes
>>> symbiotic: vibrant language fosters a dynamic, responsive cogito,
>>> while linguistic impoverishment locks the self into a state of
>>> arrested potential. Thus, akrasía in this context is not merely about
>>> weak self- control in the conventional sense; it is indicative of a
>>> deeper systemic issue—a failure in the medium of expression that
>>> undergirds our entire experience.
>>>
>>> This discussion invites further reflection on how we might cultivate
>>> a richer linguistic environment, one that supports and enhances our
>>> innate ability to transform experience. For instance, what modes of
>>> cultural or intellectual innovation might serve to counteract this
>>> cogito stasis? Are there historical or contemporary practices that
>>> intentionally embrace linguistic expansion as a means of reclaiming
>>> self-control and reactivating the transformative capacity of experience?
>>>
>>> I'd be very interested in exploring those avenues further. Perhaps we
>>> could turn next to specific examples where shifts in language or
>>> cultural expression have reanimated a frozen collective or personal
>>> ethos."
>>>
>>> On 7/3/25 07:11, dolf wrote:
>>>>
>>>> CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER
>>>> WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE
>>>> THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
>>>>
>>>> Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
>>>> crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity
>>>> (eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA
>>>> OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* / #335
>>>> - Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721 BC) as
>>>> [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 - CENTRE
>>>> (中), #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)] being ANTI-
>>>> STATISM ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS
>>>> TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH - CHRISTIANS AS
>>>> SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860 BCE + 20 x (293 x
>>>> 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1 (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE
>>>> (NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 =
>>>> NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be brought before the
>>>> International Criminal Court, a permanent international tribunal. It
>>>> was established by the ROME STATUTE adopted 17 JULY 1998.
>>>>
>>>> On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same
>>>> time at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters
>>>> in New York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to
>>>> sixty, which was the minimum number required to bring the statute
>>>> into force, as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into force
>>>> on 1 July 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed (vis a
>>>> vis in support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA
>>>> OBSTRUCTION as ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018
>>>> BY MARTIN TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE / DARREN
>>>> CHESTER / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM / VISCERAL RACIAL
>>>> HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on or after that date.
>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
>>>> women from all walks of life]
>>>>
>>>> SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF
>>>> CONTEMN (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM
>>>> REVISIONIST AS NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY
>>>> HAUGHTY SELF- ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC
>>>> (1994-2004): Given that the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT
>>>> UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is the mathematical meta-descriptive
>>>> dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TO WHICH
>>>> DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to the AMERICAN DECLARATION OF
>>>> INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which
>>>> frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that are also implicit within QUEEN
>>>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 being principles
>>>> upon which the respective REPUBLIC / COMMONWEALTH were established.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/2/25 17:10, dolf wrote:
>>>>>> Such MORPHOSIS has had a #137 - COUNTER FACILITATING AGENCY [#25 -
>>>>>> 22 JUNE 2025 AS MOP BOMBING OF IRAN'S THREE NUCLEAR FACILITIES,
>>>>>> #26, #27, #28, #31] as timely disruption and reasonably such
>>>>>> diabolical impost will no longer achieve #33 - COHESION in being
>>>>>> the antithesis notion of FEME: #314 - theótēs (G2320): GODHEAD @
>>>>>> [#9, #5, #70, #57, #8, #57, #70, #38] / NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING
>>>>>> (太 玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI- STATEM circumscribing HUMAN
>>>>>> RATIONALITY / CONSCIOUSNESS / SAPIENCE as IMAGO DEI (time / being)
>>>>>> is language associative which as we see from our informal research
>>>>>> CASE STUDY: LANGUAGE TO NOUMENA CORRESPONDENCE / SYNAPSE QUOTIENT
>>>>>> FOR IDEA ASSAYING BY NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA emailed to several
>>>>>> COGNITIVE SCIENTISTS @ 0709 HRS ON 30 MAY 2025:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "From the hypothetical origin of ROMANISED LANGUAGE to NOUMENA
>>>>>> (Kant argues that we can only think about noumena as a limiting
>>>>>> concept, a boundary to our knowledge, but we cannot make any
>>>>>> positive claims about their properties or nature) CORRESPONDENCE
>>>>>> as a "COGITO STASIS" fǔ yīn (子音 | 輔音-->意): *CONSONANT* being
>>>>>> a state in which the self’s active, transformative engagement with
>>>>>> experience as language-- but if fully embodied becomes the
>>>>>> mechanism for an apperception of enlightenment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #A / #1025 = [#281, #201, #205, #209, #129] / GRECO-ROMAN SQUARE
>>>>>> #1: SATOR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #E / #1025 = [#245, #225, #205, #185, #165] / JUDGEMENT
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
