[continued from previous message]
>>>>> In this state—symbolized through the notion of fǔ yīn (輔音 or
>>>>> “consonant”)—the self’s robust, dynamic interaction with
experience
>>>>> becomes muted. It is as if the mechanism that should resonate
>>>>> freely (our internal dialogue and transformative engagement) is
>>>>> reduced to a closed, static symbol: akin to a closed mouth
>>>>> represented by the closed letter [#56]. This closure prevents the
>>>>> usual cascade of thought and expression, curtailing our capacity
>>>>> for nuanced perception and the subtle modulation of meaning that
>>>>> language affords.
>>>>>
>>>>> The meta-descriptive codes you referenced illustrate this
>>>>> interplay. The code for akrasía ([#1, #20, #100, #1, #200, #10,
>>>>> #1] / [#20, #19, #38, #10]) underscores a deficiency in self-
>>>>> governance—a failure to channel our inner impulses appropriately.
>>>>> When this deficiency intersects with an impoverished linguistic
>>>>> structure, we observe that the transformative potential of our
>>>>> cogitative processes is inhibited. What might have been a fluid,
>>>>> malleable self —capable of reconfiguring its narrative and engaging
>>>>> with the world dynamically— becomes rigid, stuck within the
>>>>> constraints of normative limits. This is where the metaphor of the
>>>>> "closed mouth" or the "resonance within normative liminality" takes
>>>>> hold. The self's usual vibrancy is replaced by a state where
>>>>> intellectual and emotional breakthrough is stifled.
>>>>>
>>>>> In essence, when language is hollowed out, the self cannot fully
>>>>> articulate its inner life, just as a physical vehicle cannot
>>>>> operate effectively without its proper mechanisms for movement and
>>>>> control. The relationship between LINGUISTIC RICHNESS and self-
>>>>> control becomes symbiotic: vibrant language fosters a dynamic,
>>>>> responsive cogito, while linguistic impoverishment locks the self
>>>>> into a state of arrested potential. Thus, akrasía in this context
>>>>> is not merely about weak self- control in the conventional sense;
>>>>> it is indicative of a deeper systemic issue—a failure in the medium
>>>>> of expression that undergirds our entire experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> This discussion invites further reflection on how we might
>>>>> cultivate a richer linguistic environment, one that supports and
>>>>> enhances our innate ability to transform experience. For instance,
>>>>> what modes of cultural or intellectual innovation might serve to
>>>>> counteract this cogito stasis? Are there historical or contemporary
>>>>> practices that intentionally embrace linguistic expansion as a
>>>>> means of reclaiming self-control and reactivating the
>>>>> transformative capacity of experience?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd be very interested in exploring those avenues further. Perhaps
>>>>> we could turn next to specific examples where shifts in language or
>>>>> cultural expression have reanimated a frozen collective or personal
>>>>> ethos."
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/3/25 07:11, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER
>>>>>> WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE
>>>>>> THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
>>>>>> crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity
>>>>>> (eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA
>>>>>> OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* /
>>>>>> #335 - Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721
>>>>>> BC) as [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 -
>>>>>> CENTRE (中), #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)]
>>>>>> being ANTI- STATISM ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II:
>>>>>> UNALIENABLE RIGHTS TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH -
>>>>>> CHRISTIANS AS SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860
>>>>>> BCE + 20 x (293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1
>>>>>> (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE (NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12
>>>>>> SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 = NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be
>>>>>> brought before the International Criminal Court, a permanent
>>>>>> international tribunal. It was established by the ROME STATUTE
>>>>>> adopted 17 JULY 1998.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same
>>>>>> time at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters
>>>>>> in New York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to
>>>>>> sixty, which was the minimum number required to bring the statute
>>>>>> into force, as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into
>>>>>> force on 1 July 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed
>>>>>> (vis a vis in support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
-
>>>>>> SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION as ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC
>>>>>> CENTENNIAL 2018 BY MARTIN TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES
>>>>>> LEAGUE / DARREN CHESTER / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM /
>>>>>> VISCERAL RACIAL HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on or after that date.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
>>>>>> women from all walks of life]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF
>>>>>> CONTEMN (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM
>>>>>> REVISIONIST AS NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY
>>>>>> HAUGHTY SELF- ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC
>>>>>> (1994-2004): Given that the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT
>>>>>> UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is the mathematical meta-
>>>>>> descriptive dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL
>>>>>> PROPERTY TO WHICH DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to the
>>>>>> AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF
>>>>>> RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that
>>>>>> are also implicit within QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
>>>>>> OCTOBER 1900 being principles upon which the respective REPUBLIC /
>>>>>> COMMONWEALTH were established.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/2/25 17:10, dolf wrote:
>>>>>>>> Such MORPHOSIS has had a #137 - COUNTER FACILITATING AGENCY [#25
>>>>>>>> - 22 JUNE 2025 AS MOP BOMBING OF IRAN'S THREE NUCLEAR
>>>>>>>> FACILITIES, #26, #27, #28, #31] as timely disruption and
>>>>>>>> reasonably such diabolical impost will no longer achieve #33 -
>>>>>>>> COHESION in being the antithesis notion of FEME: #314 - theótēs
>>>>>>>> (G2320): GODHEAD @ [#9, #5, #70, #57, #8, #57, #70, #38] /
>>>>>>>> NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (太 玄经) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-
>>>>>>>> STATEM circumscribing HUMAN RATIONALITY / CONSCIOUSNESS /
>>>>>>>> SAPIENCE as IMAGO DEI (time / being) is language associative
>>>>>>>> which as we see from our informal research CASE STUDY: LANGUAGE
>>>>>>>> TO NOUMENA CORRESPONDENCE / SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR IDEA ASSAYING
>>>>>>>> BY NEURAL LINGUISTIC PRAGMA emailed to several COGNITIVE
>>>>>>>> SCIENTISTS @ 0709 HRS ON 30 MAY 2025:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "From the hypothetical origin of ROMANISED LANGUAGE to NOUMENA
>>>>>>>> (Kant argues that we can only think about noumena as a limiting
>>>>>>>> concept, a boundary to our knowledge, but we cannot make any
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
