[continued from previous message]
>>>>>>>>> in the sensible world – we cannot comprehend at all. Yet the
>>>>>>>>> causality of reason with respect to effects in the sensible
>>>>>>>>> world would nonetheless be freedom, insofar as objective
>>>>>>>>> grounds, which are themselves ideas, are taken to be
>>>>>>>>> determining with respect to that causality. For the action of
>>>>>>>>> that causality would in that case not depend on any subjective,
>>>>>>>>> hence also not on any temporal conditions, and would therefore
>>>>>>>>> also not depend on the natural law that serves to determine
>>>>>>>>> those conditions, because grounds of reason provide the rule
>>>>>>>>> for actions universally, from principles, without influence
>>>>>>>>> from the circumstances of time or place.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What I adduce here counts only as an example, for
>>>>>>>>> intelligibility, and does not belong necessarily to our
>>>>>>>>> question, which must be decided from mere concepts
>>>>>>>>> independently of properties that we find in the actual world.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can now say without contradiction: all actions of rational
>>>>>>>>> beings, insofar as they are appearances (are encountered in
>>>>>>>>> some experience or other), are subject to natural necessity;
>>>>>>>>> but the very same actions, with respect only to the rational
>>>>>>>>> subject and its faculty of acting in accordance with bare
>>>>>>>>> reason, are free. What, then, is required for natural
>>>>>>>>> necessity? Nothing more than the determinability of every event
>>>>>>>>> in the sensible world according to constant laws, and therefore
>>>>>>>>> a relation to a cause within appearance; whereby the underlying
>>>>>>>>> thing in itself and its causality remain unknown. But I say:
>>>>>>>>> the law of nature remains, whether the rational being be a
>>>>>>>>> cause of effects in the sensible world through reason and hence
>>>>>>>>> through freedom, or whether that being does not determine such
>>>>>>>>> effects through rational grounds. For if the first is the case,
>>>>>>>>> the action takes place according to maxims whose effect within
>>>>>>>>> appearance will always conform to constant laws; if the second
>>>>>>>>> is the case, and the action does not take [IDEA #346] place
>>>>>>>>> according to principles of reason, then it is subject to the
>>>>>>>>> empirical laws of sensibility, and in both cases the effects
>>>>>>>>> are connected according to constant laws; but we require
>>>>>>>>> nothing more for natural necessity, and indeed know nothing
>>>>>>>>> more of it. In the first case, however, reason is the cause of
>>>>>>>>> these natural laws and is therefore free, in the second case
>>>>>>>>> the effects flow according to mere natural laws of sensibility,
>>>>>>>>> because reason exercises no influence on them; but, because of
>>>>>>>>> this, reason is not itself determined by sensibility (which is
>>>>>>>>> impossible), and it is therefore also free in this case.
>>>>>>>>> Therefore freedom does not impede the natural law of
>>>>>>>>> appearances, any more than this law interferes with the freedom
>>>>>>>>> of the practical use of reason, a use that stands in connection
>>>>>>>>> with things in themselves as determining grounds." [pages 93-97]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> DOLF: "How is the notion of a civil society related to the
>>>>>>>>> inherent human disposition of animus / anima and does such
>>>>>>>>> dynamic suggest there is an ontic #22 - jié (結): *FORMATIONAL*
>>>>>>>>> (circumscribed as bounding) #135 - níng (凝): *CONGEALING* /
>>>>>>>>> [#56, #79] concept of facilitated arbitration as #174 -
>>>>>>>>> CYBERNETIC SYSTEMIC / ANTHROPOMORPHIC PRINCIPLE which when
>>>>>>>>> disordered possesses an attenuated #152 / #174 - yí (疑):
>>>>>>>>> *DEFICIENCY* / [#29, #61, #62, #22] that may in a chronic
>>>>>>>>> ontological state be regarded as either delinquency or
>>>>>>>>> reprobation?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CAN REFUSAL OF COMMUNION BY IRISH CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP PELL ON BOER
>>>>>> WAR MEMORIAL DAY / PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 BE BROUGHT BEFORE
>>>>>> THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instances of the most serious international crimes, such as war
>>>>>> crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crime against humanity
>>>>>> (eg: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
- SWASTIKA
>>>>>> OBSTRUCTION / BABYLONIAN [#314 - mágos (G3097): *WISE* *MEN* /
>>>>>> #335 - Kasday (H3779): CHALDEAN / #87 - BABYLONIAN KING (circa 721
>>>>>> BC) as [#2 - FULL CIRCLE (周), #30 - BOLD RESOLUTION (毅), #1 -
>>>>>> CENTRE (中), #4 - BARRIER (閑), #50 - VASTNESS / WASTING (唐)]
>>>>>> being ANTI- STATISM ARTIFICE as UNCONSTITUTIONAL: SECTION II:
>>>>>> UNALIENABLE RIGHTS TRANSFERENCE PROTOCOL ] PERSECUTION OF JEWISH -
>>>>>> CHRISTIANS AS SUBSTANTIATED CLAIM TO BELIEF #100 + 40 AM as 3860
>>>>>> BCE + 20 x (293 x 365.2423 TROPICAL YEARS | 294 x 364 | 6J) + 1
>>>>>> (NO 0 CE) = 2001 CE (NEW MOON 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12
>>>>>> SEPTEMBER 2001 + 182 = NEW MOON 13 / 14 MARCH 2002), can be
>>>>>> brought before the International Criminal Court, a permanent
>>>>>> international tribunal. It was established by the ROME STATUTE
>>>>>> adopted 17 JULY 1998.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11 APRIL 2002, ten countries ratified the statute at the same
>>>>>> time at a special ceremony held at the United Nations headquarters
>>>>>> in New York City,[21] bringing the total number of signatories to
>>>>>> sixty, which was the minimum number required to bring the statute
>>>>>> into force, as defined in Article 126. The treaty entered into
>>>>>> force on 1 July 2002; the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed
>>>>>> (vis a vis in support of the EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM
-
>>>>>> SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION as ANTI-STATISM impetus HIJACKING ANZAC
>>>>>> CENTENNIAL 2018 BY MARTIN TANZER, ROSS JACKSON - RETURNED SERVICES
>>>>>> LEAGUE / DARREN CHESTER / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCI ANTI-SEMITISM /
>>>>>> VISCERAL RACIAL HATRED AS PERSECUTION) on or after that date. and
>>>>>> entered into force JULY 2002.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [IMAGE SOURCE: Victorian Honour Roll of Women (2011) Inspirational
>>>>>> women from all walks of life]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SYNAPSE QUOTIENT FOR CONSIDERATION IN MAKING AN ACCUSATION OF
>>>>>> CONTEMN (WHITE COLONIAL IMPERIALIST / HISTORICAL ANTI-STATISM
>>>>>> REVISIONIST AS NON DIFFERENTIATED CHRISTO-FASCISM EXCEPTING BY
>>>>>> HAUGHTY SELF- ENTITLEMENT) AGAINST DOCTOR DIANE SISELY VEOC
>>>>>> (1994-2004): Given that the CENTRAL PREMISE to this SAPIENT
>>>>>> UTILITARIAN / TEMPORAL DYNAMIC is the mathematical meta-
>>>>>> descriptive dialectic as idea template (AS OUR INTELLECTUAL
>>>>>> PROPERTY TO WHICH DOCTOR SISELY HAS NEVER CONFORMED) to the
>>>>>> AMERICAN DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 and BILL OF
>>>>>> RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 which frames #87 - UNALIENABLE RIGHTS that
>>>>>> are also implicit within QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
>>>>>> OCTOBER 1900 being principles upon which the respective REPUBLIC /
>>>>>> COMMONWEALTH were established.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [#74]
>>>>>>>>> [#14, #17]
>>>>>>>>> [#3, #11, #18, #32, #34, #49, #54, #60, #66, #67, #73, #76, #78]
>>>>>>>>> [#23, #26, #27, #31, #34, #38, #44, #67]
>>>>>>>>> [#5, #6, #17, #39, #57, #77]
>>>>>>>>> [#37, #47, #78]
>>>>>>>>> [#12, #67]
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
