home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,314 of 44,666   
   dolf to dolf   
   Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (7/41)   
   11 Jul 25 06:23:44   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   >   
   > IF WE DO NOT HEAR FROM YOU WITHIN THE NEXT WEEK WE WILL ASSUME THAT NO   
   FURTHER FOLLOW-UP IS REQUIRED AND THE REFERRAL WILL BE CLOSED."   
   >   
   > ACCORDINGLY THE MATTER HAS BEEN SATISFACTORY RESOLVED AS HAVING NO CRITERIA   
   FOR ANY MENTAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT AND IS ENTIRELY NOW CLOSED AS BEING WITHOUT   
   ANY LAWFUL GROUNDS AS THERE BEING ANY EXISTING OR SUBSTANTIAL CRITERIA FOR   
   ASSESSMENT.   
   >   
   > Nevertheless this POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS deficiency prevailed to this day   
   and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as   
   GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL   
   CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER:    
   Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING ON 31   
   OCTOBER 2024, without explanation for which we are desirous of pursuing a   
   legal claim of RACIAL HATRED / ANTI SEMITIC being a breach of CONSTITUTIONAL   
   RIGHTS / WAR CRIME due to an    
   endemic ANTI-STATISM #1772 - ARTIFICE (PAPAL CONCLAVE OF 1621 v's DUTCH   
   DISCOVERY OF 26 OCTOBER 1616) as immigrant mindset (a parasitic pestilence   
   whose opportunism is detrimental to duties requisite for a civil society and   
   the dignity of persons whose    
   heritage is first discovery) prevalent amongst persons associated with that   
   medical facility.   
   >   
   > *** TO BE CONTINUED ***   
   >   
   > -------------------------------   
   >   
   >   
   > On 7/10/25 09:25, dolf wrote:   
   >>   
   >> Subsequent to that determined PROTEST ACTION of 21 AUGUST 1999 as   
   >> occurring betwixt the EVENTS in being a #509 - yâhad (H3054):   
   >> *JEWISH* / MALE: #511 / FEME: #267 - NazĹ   
   raĂ®os (G3480): *CHRISTIAN*   
   >> OBSERVER at the RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF COMMUNION PROTESTS   
   >> OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11 JUNE 2000 (163rd day of   
   >> leap year) - SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON 27   
   >> FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163 - PROVIDENCE GIVES THE VICTORY TO THE MAN   
   >> WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE THE BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN HIM, and in   
   >> accordance with being collective owners (ie. our INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY   
   >> relating to INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT   
   >> were amortised between the respective property holders) of a PRIVATE   
   >> STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a   
   >> TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there was prepared a report dated 16 MAY   
   >> 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for   
   >> Planning Permit where the property holder (ie. typical ITALIAN MAFIA   
   >> engaged within #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM which is incompatible with   
   >> COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR GOVERNANCE as democracy)   
   >> on the other side of the road had substantial opportunity to   
   >> repeatedly object to numerous planning permits in the knowledge of   
   >> their own intentions, thereby causing ourselves financial distress and   
   >> property loss of our primary #39 - RESIDENCE which was contributed to   
   >> by the expense of legal action by impetus of their haughty cultural   
   >> (JULY / AUGUST) self entitlement and disrespect.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:   
   >>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE   
   >>> MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this VCAT   
   >>> REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE   
   >>> given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM".   
   >>> At our last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @ CONSULTING   
   >>> ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we requested action   
   >>> as CLOSURE of a DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999   
   >>> MEDICAL INTERACTION which resulted within improper as false   
   >>> characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite my   
   >>> reasonable attempts to have those improper entries amended due to   
   >>> their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE upon my AUTONOMY and   
   >>> HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has prevailed to this day and as   
   >>> we foresaw have spiralled into a most recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as   
   >>> GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER   
   >>> MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER: Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and   
   >>> withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without   
   >>> explanation.   
   >>>   
   >>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as CHIEF   
   >>> LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-NATIONAL   
   >>> CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS HEARING of 5   
   >>> DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful misrepresentation of my   
   >>> two telephone calls as the basis of a false report to police and   
   >>> perjured evidence.  The following is a transcript (which may contain   
   >>> transcription and conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated   
   >>> 11 FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL &   
   >>> ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of   
   >>> 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE   
   >>> presiding over CASE NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN   
   >>> CASUALTY & LIFE (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The   
   >>> proceedings were conducted by telephone hook-up.   
   >>>   
   >>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?   
   >>>   
   >>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by   
   >>>   
   >>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have   
   >>> SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.   
   >>>   
   >>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been   
   >>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the   
   >>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in effect,   
   >>> what that letter raised were concerns about certain conduct of Mr   
   >>> Boek which, as I understand it, has been the subject of a report to   
   >>> police. The reason why the Tribunal deals with these matters   
   >>> initially at least, unless there is some exceptional circumstance   
   >>> that would warrant otherwise by bringing on a directions hearing, is   
   >>> so that the Tribunal can, if necessary, receive evidence of what the   
   >>> relevant matter is and then determine how best to deal with it.   
   >>>   
   >>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is   
   >>> held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone   
   >>> the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is in   
   >>> fact what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell, to   
   >>> explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the   
   >>> respondents and, of course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr   
   >>> Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.   
   >>>   
   >>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I   
   >>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone call,   
   >>> advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I then   
   >>> accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite threatened by   
   >>> the content of those messages and I had grave concerns for my safety   
   >>> and the safety of my family. I, that morning contacted the Victoria   
   >>> Police and reported the matter and they viewed the matter most   
   >>> seriously. They suggested that I not present myself in the presence   
   >>> of Mr Boek, which is why I am presenting myself by way of telephone   
   >>> today.   
   >>>   
   >>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about   
   >>> that. Yes?   
   >>>   
   >>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a   
   >>> transcript of those   
   >>>   
   >>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?   
   >>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca