[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>> PRIVATE STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT shared   
   >>> with a TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there was prepared a report dated   
   >>> 16 MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application   
   >>> for Planning Permit where the property holder (ie. typical ITALIAN   
   >>> MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM which is   
   >>> incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR   
   >>> GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of the road had   
   >>> substantial opportunity to repeatedly object to numerous planning   
   >>> permits in the knowledge of their own intentions, thereby causing   
   >>> ourselves financial distress and property loss of our primary #39 -   
   >>> RESIDENCE which was contributed to by the expense of legal action by   
   >>> impetus of their haughty cultural (JULY / AUGUST) self entitlement   
   >>> and disrespect.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:   
   >>>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE   
   >>>> MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this   
   >>>> VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY   
   >>>> DEFENCE given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-   
   >>>> STATISM". At our last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @   
   >>>> CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we   
   >>>> requested action as CLOSURE of a DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25   
   >>>> AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION which resulted within improper as   
   >>>> false characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite   
   >>>> my reasonable attempts to have those improper entries amended due to   
   >>>> their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE upon my AUTONOMY and   
   >>>> HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has prevailed to this day and as   
   >>>> we foresaw have spiralled into a most recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as   
   >>>> GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER   
   >>>> MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER: Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and   
   >>>> withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without   
   >>>> explanation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as   
   >>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-   
   >>>> NATIONAL CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS   
   >>>> HEARING of 5 DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful   
   >>>> misrepresentation of my two telephone calls as the basis of a false   
   >>>> report to police and perjured evidence.  The following is a   
   >>>> transcript (which may contain transcription and conceptual errors   
   >>>> due to reduced audibility) dated 11 FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from   
   >>>> tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL   
   >>>> (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER   
   >>>> 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE presiding over CASE   
   >>>> NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN CASUALTY & LIFE   
   >>>> (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The proceedings were   
   >>>> conducted by telephone hook-up.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have   
   >>>> SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been   
   >>>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the   
   >>>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in   
   >>>> effect, what that letter raised were concerns about certain conduct   
   >>>> of Mr Boek which, as I understand it, has been the subject of a   
   >>>> report to police. The reason why the Tribunal deals with these   
   >>>> matters initially at least, unless there is some exceptional   
   >>>> circumstance that would warrant otherwise by bringing on a   
   >>>> directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if necessary,   
   >>>> receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then determine   
   >>>> how best to deal with it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is   
   >>>> held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone   
   >>>> the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is   
   >>>> in fact what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell,   
   >>>> to explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the   
   >>>> respondents and, of course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr   
   >>>> Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I   
   >>>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone   
   >>>> call, advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I then   
   >>>> accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite threatened by   
   >>>> the content of those messages and I had grave concerns for my safety   
   >>>> and the safety of my family. I, that morning contacted the Victoria   
   >>>> Police and reported the matter and they viewed the matter most   
   >>>> seriously. They suggested that I not present myself in the presence   
   >>>> of Mr Boek, which is why I am presenting myself by way of telephone   
   >>>> today.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about   
   >>>> that. Yes?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a   
   >>>> transcript of those   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my   
   >>>> associate to take an affirmation from you because given the   
   >>>> seriousness of the matter it ought to be on evidence.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the tape   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will adjust   
   >>>> the volume.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT   
   >>>> IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF   
   >>>> YOUR PAST TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE   
   >>>> HAVING ANOTHER CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH YOU   
   >>>> FURTHER AND WE WILL ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME STAGE. AT   
   >>>> SOME STAGE YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNISE THE FACT THAT YOU ARE   
   >>>> A BLASPHEMER. YOUR RELIGIOUS CONTEXT HAS NO CONTINUING VALIDITY AND   
   >>>> SINCE I AM ABLE TO RATIONALLY PROVE THAT WITH A MATHEMATICAL   
   >>>> MODEL..... YOU ARE GOING TO UNDERSTAND HOW FORCEFUL AND HARD   
   >>>> METAPHYSICS IS."   
   >>>>   
   >>>> MR RIDDELL: That concludes the two voice mail messages.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The purpose of our pre-CONSULTATION NOTE conveyed to the MEDICAL   
   >>>> SPECIALIST dated 8 JULY 2025, was to proffer current advice on our   
   >>>> writing a submission within VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXXX / 2025 as a LIFE   
   >>>> CONTEXT STATEMENT which encompasses that PROTEST EVENT ON 21 / 25   
   >>>> AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION and over which there is exuded a   
   >>>> certain self- assuredness and satisfaction expressed within the   
   >>>> content of TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO made to CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR THE   
   >>>> INSURER on 30 NOVEMBER 2001 as then causal for the EXTRA-ORDINARY   
   >>>> VCAT DIRECTIONS HEARING dated 5 DECEMBER 2001 conveying their   
   >>>> misrepresentation as impetus for a strikeout of the matter, as then   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)