home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,377 of 44,666   
   dolf to dolf   
   Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (10/27)   
   11 Jul 25 16:48:19   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>> OBSERVER at the RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF COMMUNION   
   >>>>> PROTESTS OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11 JUNE 2000   
   >>>>> (163rd day of leap year) - SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE   
   >>>>> TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163 - PROVIDENCE GIVES THE   
   >>>>> VICTORY TO THE MAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE THE BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN   
   >>>>> HIM, and in accordance with being collective owners (ie. our   
   >>>>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relating to INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO QUEEN   
   >>>>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT were amortised between the respective   
   >>>>> property holders) of a PRIVATE STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL   
   >>>>> BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there   
   >>>>> was prepared a report dated 16 MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as   
   >>>>> a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit where the property   
   >>>>> holder (ie. typical ITALIAN MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 -   
   >>>>> ANTI-STATISM which is incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF   
   >>>>> LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of   
   >>>>> the road had substantial opportunity to repeatedly object to   
   >>>>> numerous planning permits in the knowledge of their own intentions,   
   >>>>> thereby causing ourselves financial distress and property loss of   
   >>>>> our primary #39 - RESIDENCE which was contributed to by the expense   
   >>>>> of legal action by impetus of their haughty cultural (JULY /   
   >>>>> AUGUST) self entitlement and disrespect.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:   
   >>>>>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE   
   >>>>>> MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this   
   >>>>>> VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY   
   >>>>>> DEFENCE given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-   
   >>>>>> STATISM". At our last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @   
   >>>>>> CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we   
   >>>>>> requested action as CLOSURE of a DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 /   
   >>>>>> 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION which resulted within improper   
   >>>>>> as false characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that,   
   >>>>>> despite my reasonable attempts to have those improper entries   
   >>>>>> amended due to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE   
   >>>>>> upon my AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has   
   >>>>>> prevailed to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most   
   >>>>>> recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS   
   >>>>>> FOR THE ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER:   
   >>>>>> Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING   
   >>>>>> ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without explanation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as   
   >>>>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-   
   >>>>>> NATIONAL CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS   
   >>>>>> HEARING of 5 DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful   
   >>>>>> misrepresentation of my two telephone calls as the basis of a   
   >>>>>> false report to police and perjured evidence.  The following is a   
   >>>>>> transcript (which may contain transcription and conceptual errors   
   >>>>>> due to reduced audibility) dated 11 FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from   
   >>>>>> tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL   
   >>>>>> (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER   
   >>>>>> 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE presiding over CASE   
   >>>>>> NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN CASUALTY & LIFE   
   >>>>>> (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The proceedings   
   >>>>>> were conducted by telephone hook-up.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have   
   >>>>>> SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been   
   >>>>>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the   
   >>>>>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in   
   >>>>>> effect, what that letter raised were concerns about certain   
   >>>>>> conduct of Mr Boek which, as I understand it, has been the subject   
   >>>>>> of a report to police. The reason why the Tribunal deals with   
   >>>>>> these matters initially at least, unless there is some exceptional   
   >>>>>> circumstance that would warrant otherwise by bringing on a   
   >>>>>> directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if necessary,   
   >>>>>> receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then determine   
   >>>>>> how best to deal with it.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is   
   >>>>>> held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone   
   >>>>>> the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is   
   >>>>>> in fact what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell,   
   >>>>>> to explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the   
   >>>>>> respondents and, of course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr   
   >>>>>> Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I   
   >>>>>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone   
   >>>>>> call, advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I   
   >>>>>> then accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite   
   >>>>>> threatened by the content of those messages and I had grave   
   >>>>>> concerns for my safety and the safety of my family. I, that   
   >>>>>> morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the matter and   
   >>>>>> they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I not   
   >>>>>> present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am   
   >>>>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about   
   >>>>>> that. Yes?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a   
   >>>>>> transcript of those   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my   
   >>>>>> associate to take an affirmation from you because given the   
   >>>>>> seriousness of the matter it ought to be on evidence.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the   
   >>>>>> tape   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will   
   >>>>>> adjust the volume.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT   
   >>>>>> IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF   
   >>>>>> YOUR PAST TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE   
   >>>>>> HAVING ANOTHER CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH   
   >>>>>> YOU FURTHER AND WE WILL ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME   
   >>>>>> STAGE. AT SOME STAGE YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNISE THE FACT   
   >>>>>> THAT YOU ARE A BLASPHEMER. YOUR RELIGIOUS CONTEXT HAS NO   
   >>>>>> CONTINUING VALIDITY AND SINCE I AM ABLE TO RATIONALLY PROVE THAT   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca