Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,377 of 44,666    |
|    dolf to dolf    |
|    Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (10/27)    |
|    11 Jul 25 16:48:19    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>> OBSERVER at the RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF COMMUNION       >>>>> PROTESTS OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11 JUNE 2000       >>>>> (163rd day of leap year) - SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE       >>>>> TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163 - PROVIDENCE GIVES THE       >>>>> VICTORY TO THE MAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE THE BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN       >>>>> HIM, and in accordance with being collective owners (ie. our       >>>>> INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relating to INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO QUEEN       >>>>> VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT were amortised between the respective       >>>>> property holders) of a PRIVATE STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL       >>>>> BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there       >>>>> was prepared a report dated 16 MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as       >>>>> a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit where the property       >>>>> holder (ie. typical ITALIAN MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 -       >>>>> ANTI-STATISM which is incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF       >>>>> LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of       >>>>> the road had substantial opportunity to repeatedly object to       >>>>> numerous planning permits in the knowledge of their own intentions,       >>>>> thereby causing ourselves financial distress and property loss of       >>>>> our primary #39 - RESIDENCE which was contributed to by the expense       >>>>> of legal action by impetus of their haughty cultural (JULY /       >>>>> AUGUST) self entitlement and disrespect.       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:       >>>>>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved INSURANCE       >>>>>> MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are relevant to this       >>>>>> VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of an ILLEGALITY       >>>>>> DEFENCE given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-       >>>>>> STATISM". At our last appointment with the MEDICAL SPECIALIST @       >>>>>> CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we       >>>>>> requested action as CLOSURE of a DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 /       >>>>>> 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL INTERACTION which resulted within improper       >>>>>> as false characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that,       >>>>>> despite my reasonable attempts to have those improper entries       >>>>>> amended due to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE       >>>>>> upon my AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has       >>>>>> prevailed to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most       >>>>>> recent SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS       >>>>>> FOR THE ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER:       >>>>>> Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS HEARING       >>>>>> ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without explanation.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as       >>>>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a TRANS-       >>>>>> NATIONAL CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY DIRECTIONS       >>>>>> HEARING of 5 DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and wrongful       >>>>>> misrepresentation of my two telephone calls as the basis of a       >>>>>> false report to police and perjured evidence. The following is a       >>>>>> transcript (which may contain transcription and conceptual errors       >>>>>> due to reduced audibility) dated 11 FEBRUARY 2004 obtained from       >>>>>> tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL & ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL       >>>>>> (anti-discrimination list) as proceedings of 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER       >>>>>> 2001 before DEPUTY PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE presiding over CASE       >>>>>> NUMBER: A500 of 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN CASUALTY & LIFE       >>>>>> (AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The proceedings       >>>>>> were conducted by telephone hook-up.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by       >>>>>>       >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also have       >>>>>> SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual legal group.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been       >>>>>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the       >>>>>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in       >>>>>> effect, what that letter raised were concerns about certain       >>>>>> conduct of Mr Boek which, as I understand it, has been the subject       >>>>>> of a report to police. The reason why the Tribunal deals with       >>>>>> these matters initially at least, unless there is some exceptional       >>>>>> circumstance that would warrant otherwise by bringing on a       >>>>>> directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can, if necessary,       >>>>>> receive evidence of what the relevant matter is and then determine       >>>>>> how best to deal with it.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing is       >>>>>> held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by telephone       >>>>>> the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request and that is       >>>>>> in fact what has happened today. Now, I might get you, Mr Riddell,       >>>>>> to explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct have concerned the       >>>>>> respondents and, of course, I will give you a chance to reply, Mr       >>>>>> Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very well, Mr Riddell.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I       >>>>>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone       >>>>>> call, advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I       >>>>>> then accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite       >>>>>> threatened by the content of those messages and I had grave       >>>>>> concerns for my safety and the safety of my family. I, that       >>>>>> morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the matter and       >>>>>> they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I not       >>>>>> present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am       >>>>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about       >>>>>> that. Yes?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a       >>>>>> transcript of those       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?       >>>>>>       >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my       >>>>>> associate to take an affirmation from you because given the       >>>>>> seriousness of the matter it ought to be on evidence.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play the       >>>>>> tape       >>>>>>       >>>>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will       >>>>>> adjust the volume.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE THAT       >>>>>> IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR JUSTIFICATIONS OF       >>>>>> YOUR PAST TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW YEAR WE WILL NOT BE       >>>>>> HAVING ANOTHER CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT BE CO-OPERATING WITH       >>>>>> YOU FURTHER AND WE WILL ARE MORE LIKELY TO GO TO COURT AT SOME       >>>>>> STAGE. AT SOME STAGE YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO RECOGNISE THE FACT       >>>>>> THAT YOU ARE A BLASPHEMER. YOUR RELIGIOUS CONTEXT HAS NO       >>>>>> CONTINUING VALIDITY AND SINCE I AM ABLE TO RATIONALLY PROVE THAT              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca