home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.politics      General politics discussion      44,666 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 44,403 of 44,666   
   dolf to dolf   
   Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (13/31)   
   12 Jul 25 15:00:28   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>>> *CHRISTIAN* OBSERVER at the RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF   
   >>>>>>> COMMUNION PROTESTS OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11   
   >>>>>>> JUNE 2000 (163rd day of leap year) - SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD   
   >>>>>>> HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163 -   
   >>>>>>> PROVIDENCE GIVES THE VICTORY TO THE MAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE THE   
   >>>>>>> BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN HIM, and in accordance with being   
   >>>>>>> collective owners (ie. our INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relating to   
   >>>>>>> INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT were   
   >>>>>>> amortised between the respective property holders) of a PRIVATE   
   >>>>>>> STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a   
   >>>>>>> TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there was prepared a report dated 16   
   >>>>>>> MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application   
   >>>>>>> for Planning Permit where the property holder (ie. typical   
   >>>>>>> ITALIAN MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM which   
   >>>>>>> is incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR   
   >>>>>>> GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of the road had   
   >>>>>>> substantial opportunity to repeatedly object to numerous planning   
   >>>>>>> permits in the knowledge of their own intentions, thereby causing   
   >>>>>>> ourselves financial distress and property loss of our primary #39   
   >>>>>>> - RESIDENCE which was contributed to by the expense of legal   
   >>>>>>> action by impetus of their haughty cultural (JULY / AUGUST) self   
   >>>>>>> entitlement and disrespect.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved   
   >>>>>>>> INSURANCE MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are   
   >>>>>>>> relevant to this VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of   
   >>>>>>>> an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL   
   >>>>>>>> #1621 / #1772 - ANTI- STATISM". At our last appointment with the   
   >>>>>>>> MEDICAL SPECIALIST @ CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND   
   >>>>>>>> HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we requested action as CLOSURE of a   
   >>>>>>>> DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL   
   >>>>>>>> INTERACTION which resulted within improper as false   
   >>>>>>>> characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite my   
   >>>>>>>> reasonable attempts to have those improper entries amended due   
   >>>>>>>> to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE upon my   
   >>>>>>>> AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has prevailed   
   >>>>>>>> to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most recent   
   >>>>>>>> SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE   
   >>>>>>>> ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER:   
   >>>>>>>> Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS   
   >>>>>>>> HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without explanation.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as   
   >>>>>>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a   
   >>>>>>>> TRANS- NATIONAL CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY   
   >>>>>>>> DIRECTIONS HEARING of 5 DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and   
   >>>>>>>> wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone calls as the   
   >>>>>>>> basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence.  The   
   >>>>>>>> following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and   
   >>>>>>>> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 FEBRUARY   
   >>>>>>>> 2004 obtained from tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL &   
   >>>>>>>> ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (anti-discrimination list) as   
   >>>>>>>> proceedings of 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER 2001 before DEPUTY   
   >>>>>>>> PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE presiding over CASE NUMBER: A500 of   
   >>>>>>>> 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN CASUALTY & LIFE (AXA GLOBAL   
   >>>>>>>> GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The proceedings were   
   >>>>>>>> conducted by telephone hook-up.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also   
   >>>>>>>> have SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual   
   >>>>>>>> legal group.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been   
   >>>>>>>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the   
   >>>>>>>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in   
   >>>>>>>> effect, what that letter raised were concerns about certain   
   >>>>>>>> conduct of Mr Boek which, as I understand it, has been the   
   >>>>>>>> subject of a report to police. The reason why the Tribunal deals   
   >>>>>>>> with these matters initially at least, unless there is some   
   >>>>>>>> exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by   
   >>>>>>>> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can,   
   >>>>>>>> if necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is   
   >>>>>>>> and then determine how best to deal with it.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing   
   >>>>>>>> is held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by   
   >>>>>>>> telephone the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request   
   >>>>>>>> and that is in fact what has happened today. Now, I might get   
   >>>>>>>> you, Mr Riddell, to explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct   
   >>>>>>>> have concerned the respondents and, of course, I will give you a   
   >>>>>>>> chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very   
   >>>>>>>> well, Mr Riddell.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I   
   >>>>>>>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone   
   >>>>>>>> call, advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I   
   >>>>>>>> then accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite   
   >>>>>>>> threatened by the content of those messages and I had grave   
   >>>>>>>> concerns for my safety and the safety of my family. I, that   
   >>>>>>>> morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the matter   
   >>>>>>>> and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I   
   >>>>>>>> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am   
   >>>>>>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about   
   >>>>>>>> that. Yes?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a   
   >>>>>>>> transcript of those   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my   
   >>>>>>>> associate to take an affirmation from you because given the   
   >>>>>>>> seriousness of the matter it ought to be on evidence.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play   
   >>>>>>>> the tape   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will   
   >>>>>>>> adjust the volume.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE   
   >>>>>>>> THAT IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR   
   >>>>>>>> JUSTIFICATIONS OF YOUR PAST TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW   
   >>>>>>>> YEAR WE WILL NOT BE HAVING ANOTHER CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca