Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.politics    |    General politics discussion    |    44,666 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 44,403 of 44,666    |
|    dolf to dolf    |
|    Re: DOLF eats hagelslag (13/31)    |
|    12 Jul 25 15:00:28    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>>>> *CHRISTIAN* OBSERVER at the RAINBOW SASH PENTECOST REFUSAL OF       >>>>>>> COMMUNION PROTESTS OF BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY ON 31 MAY 1998 / 11       >>>>>>> JUNE 2000 (163rd day of leap year) - SEE BELOW REDUCTIO AD       >>>>>>> HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON 27 FEBRUARY 1942 AS IDEA #163 -       >>>>>>> PROVIDENCE GIVES THE VICTORY TO THE MAN WHO KNOWS HOW TO USE THE       >>>>>>> BRAINS NATURE HAS GIVEN HIM, and in accordance with being       >>>>>>> collective owners (ie. our INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY relating to       >>>>>>> INFORMAL RESEARCH INTO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT were       >>>>>>> amortised between the respective property holders) of a PRIVATE       >>>>>>> STREET on the edge of the CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT shared with a       >>>>>>> TELSTRA TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, there was prepared a report dated 16       >>>>>>> MAY 2000 in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application       >>>>>>> for Planning Permit where the property holder (ie. typical       >>>>>>> ITALIAN MAFIA engaged within #1621 / #1772 - ANTI-STATISM which       >>>>>>> is incompatible with COMMONWEALTH / RULE OF LAW / MONARCHY / FAIR       >>>>>>> GOVERNANCE as democracy) on the other side of the road had       >>>>>>> substantial opportunity to repeatedly object to numerous planning       >>>>>>> permits in the knowledge of their own intentions, thereby causing       >>>>>>> ourselves financial distress and property loss of our primary #39       >>>>>>> - RESIDENCE which was contributed to by the expense of legal       >>>>>>> action by impetus of their haughty cultural (JULY / AUGUST) self       >>>>>>> entitlement and disrespect.       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> On 7/10/25 08:25, dolf wrote:       >>>>>>>> Returning again to our explanation involving unresolved       >>>>>>>> INSURANCE MATTERS OF VCAT 500 OF 2000 which we allege are       >>>>>>>> relevant to this VCAT REFERENCE: XXXXX / 2025 as an assertion of       >>>>>>>> an ILLEGALITY DEFENCE given the "PROPOSITION OF HISTORICAL       >>>>>>>> #1621 / #1772 - ANTI- STATISM". At our last appointment with the       >>>>>>>> MEDICAL SPECIALIST @ CONSULTING ROOMS, CENTRAL GIPPSLAND       >>>>>>>> HOSPITAL on 2 MAY 2025, we requested action as CLOSURE of a       >>>>>>>> DELIBERATE PROTEST EVENT OF 21 / 25 AUGUST 1999 MEDICAL       >>>>>>>> INTERACTION which resulted within improper as false       >>>>>>>> characterisation within POLICE COMPUTER RECORDS that, despite my       >>>>>>>> reasonable attempts to have those improper entries amended due       >>>>>>>> to their capacity to effect an ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE upon my       >>>>>>>> AUTONOMY and HUMAN RIGHTS, which as a deficiency has prevailed       >>>>>>>> to this day and as we foresaw have spiralled into a most recent       >>>>>>>> SLANDEROUS SCENARIO as GROUNDS being INSUBSTANTIAL FACTS FOR THE       >>>>>>>> ORDERS BY THE CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE AS CASE NUMBER:       >>>>>>>> Q11839982 of 30 AUGUST 2024 and withdrawn at a DIRECTIONS       >>>>>>>> HEARING ON 31 OCTOBER 2024, without explanation.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> That document conveyed details of PETER RIDDELL’S submission as       >>>>>>>> CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR AXA GLOBAL GROUP INSURANCE being a       >>>>>>>> TRANS- NATIONAL CORPORATION made to the VCAT EXTRA-ORDINARY       >>>>>>>> DIRECTIONS HEARING of 5 DECEMBER 2001 in the mischievous and       >>>>>>>> wrongful misrepresentation of my two telephone calls as the       >>>>>>>> basis of a false report to police and perjured evidence. The       >>>>>>>> following is a transcript (which may contain transcription and       >>>>>>>> conceptual errors due to reduced audibility) dated 11 FEBRUARY       >>>>>>>> 2004 obtained from tapes provided by the VICTORIA CIVIL &       >>>>>>>> ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL (anti-discrimination list) as       >>>>>>>> proceedings of 0936 hours 5 DECEMBER 2001 before DEPUTY       >>>>>>>> PRESIDENT MS. CATE MCKENZIE presiding over CASE NUMBER: A500 of       >>>>>>>> 2000 in the matter of AUSTRALIAN CASUALTY & LIFE (AXA GLOBAL       >>>>>>>> GROUP INSURANCE) and MARK CAPECCHI. The proceedings were       >>>>>>>> conducted by telephone hook-up.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Telephone?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> Thank you. Mr Riddell, you are appearing by       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Yes, madam, I appear by way of telephone. I also       >>>>>>>> have SHANNON LINDNER with me who is a solicitor in the actual       >>>>>>>> legal group.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Very well now, this directions hearing has been       >>>>>>>> called on as a result of a letter which has been sent by the       >>>>>>>> respondents to the Tribunal. The best way I can summarise, in       >>>>>>>> effect, what that letter raised were concerns about certain       >>>>>>>> conduct of Mr Boek which, as I understand it, has been the       >>>>>>>> subject of a report to police. The reason why the Tribunal deals       >>>>>>>> with these matters initially at least, unless there is some       >>>>>>>> exceptional circumstance that would warrant otherwise by       >>>>>>>> bringing on a directions hearing, is so that the Tribunal can,       >>>>>>>> if necessary, receive evidence of what the relevant matter is       >>>>>>>> and then determine how best to deal with it.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> In this case, and in fact every case where a directions hearing       >>>>>>>> is held, if there is a request made by a party to appear by       >>>>>>>> telephone the Tribunal is very happy to accommodate that request       >>>>>>>> and that is in fact what has happened today. Now, I might get       >>>>>>>> you, Mr Riddell, to explain what aspects of Mr Boek's conduct       >>>>>>>> have concerned the respondents and, of course, I will give you a       >>>>>>>> chance to reply, Mr Boek, after Mr Riddell has finished. Very       >>>>>>>> well, Mr Riddell.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Thank you, madam. On 30 NOVEMBER in the morning I       >>>>>>>> received a telephone call from Mr Boek, a threatening telephone       >>>>>>>> call, advising that he had left a number of messages for me. I       >>>>>>>> then accessed those messages on my voice mail and was quite       >>>>>>>> threatened by the content of those messages and I had grave       >>>>>>>> concerns for my safety and the safety of my family. I, that       >>>>>>>> morning contacted the Victoria Police and reported the matter       >>>>>>>> and they viewed the matter most seriously. They suggested that I       >>>>>>>> not present myself in the presence of Mr Boek, which is why I am       >>>>>>>> presenting myself by way of telephone today.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Yes, and as I say, there is no difficulty about       >>>>>>>> that. Yes?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: Two messages. I have forwarded to the Tribunal a       >>>>>>>> transcript of those       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Have you a recording of them?       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: I do and I would like to play that for the Tribunal.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly. May I just, before you do, get my       >>>>>>>> associate to take an affirmation from you because given the       >>>>>>>> seriousness of the matter it ought to be on evidence.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> MR PETER ANTHONY RIDDELL, affirmed [9.36am]       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Recording. Thank you. Now, if you would play       >>>>>>>> the tape       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> MR RIDDELL: If it is not clear please let me know and I will       >>>>>>>> adjust the volume.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> THE D.PRESIDENT: Certainly.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE ONE: HERE OMITTED AS ADDRESSED ABOVE.       >>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>> TELEPHONE MESSAGE TWO: "MR RIDDELL, DOLF BOEK. YOU DO REALISE       >>>>>>>> THAT IF YOU ARE NOT PREPARED TO COME CLEAN WITH YOUR       >>>>>>>> JUSTIFICATIONS OF YOUR PAST TREATMENT OF ME THAT AS OF THE NEW       >>>>>>>> YEAR WE WILL NOT BE HAVING ANOTHER CONTRACT BECAUSE I WILL NOT              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca