[continued from previous message]   
      
   (實)’s three-fold perceptual loop might navigate this.   
      
   1. THE HETERONORMATIVE MORAL ANCHOR   
      
   	1	Manufactured Consensus   
   	◦	Relies on two fused poles: media/ideological supply and public   
   compliance.   
   	◦	Anchors moral identity in fixed binaries (male/female,   
   heterosexual/homosexual).   
   	◦	   
   	3	Heterosexual Species as Moral Prototype   
   	◦	Functions like a “centre heteros” with anchoring points in tradition,   
   religion, law, advertising, and disciplinary norms.   
   	◦	Seeks to suppress ambiguity and enforce self-censorship.   
   	◦	   
   This system resists internal critique, but as society diversifies, it   
   strains under challenges to its foundational binaries.   
      
   2. THE RISE OF EXISTENTIAL ICONOCLASM   
      
   • Iconoclasm here means the dismantling of entrenched moral idols:   
   strict gender roles, compulsory heterosexuality, binary definitions of   
   family and identity.   
      
   • Existential Crisis of Values   
   	•	Individuals question inherited moral anchor points and confront a   
   void of unclaimed meaning.   
   	•	Across cultures, this universal crisis manifests as deep uncertainty   
   about who “we” are and what values we share.   
      
   When moral idols break, the public consensus fragments and individuals   
   face an abyss of choice and responsibility.   
      
   3. SARTREAN INSIGHTS ON IDENTITY CRISIS   
   Jean-Paul Sartre’s existentialism emphasizes that “existence precedes   
   essence”—we must freely craft our identity and values. An identity   
   crisis erupts when one recognizes the freedom (and burden) to redefine   
   oneself outside prescribed roles.   
      
   Key takeaways:   
   	•	Authenticity demands stepping beyond inherited scripts.   
   	•	Responsibility for one’s self-definition intensifies when the old   
   idols fall.   
      
   4. shí (實) AS A NAVIGATIONAL FRAMEWORK   
   By contrast, the tripartite meta-descriptive process of shí invites a   
   dynamic, self-correcting loop:   
      
   	1	ONTIC (“What is”)   
   	◦	Honest appraisal of lived diversity and its tangled complexities.   
   	2	TELIC (“Why / Beyond”)   
   	◦	A drive to transcend binary constraints—surpassing old moral forms.   
   	3	DEME (“So / Result”)   
   	◦	Co-creates new collective norms that reflect this transformation.   
      
   Instead of stasis, shí fosters an ongoing spiral of being, purpose, and   
   consequence—equipping us to rebuild shared values from the ground up.   
      
   5. TOWARD A POST-ICONOCLASTIC MORALITY   
   	•	The collapse of a manufactured heterosexual moral axis is underway.   
   	•	Without a dynamic process like shí, iconoclasm risks leaving a vacuum   
   of meaning.   
   	•	Embracing shí’s triadic registers can guide us through the   
   crisis—grounding us in reality, fueling purposive transformation, and   
   generating new ethical consensus.   
      
      
   In short, yes: the heteronormative species-moral complex is fracturing   
   into homo sapiens iconoclasm. The question now is whether we adopt a   
   static, fractured consensus or co-create a fluid, self-correcting   
   morality rooted in the tripartite truth of shí.   
      
   A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   Revision Date: 1 August 2025   
      
      
   --   
      
   Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable   
   DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3   
   library.   
         
    (Download resources)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)