XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.homosexual   
   From: nobody@haph.org   
      
   J Carlson  news:106iudr$hus1$1@dont-email.me Fri, 01   
   Aug 2025 17:44:27 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
      
   > On 7/31/2025 6:40 AM, % wrote:   
   >> pothead wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-07-31, Gremlin  wrote:   
   >>>> Chris Ahlstrom    
   >>>> news:106b7ap$2quor$1@dont-email.me Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:27:20 GMT in   
   >>>> alt.computer.workshop, wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Do rubber rooms have internet access?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Snit has seen several special rooms. You might want to ask what the   
   >>>> interior decoration looked like.   
   >>>   
   >>> OMG!!   
   >>> That's funny.   
   >>>   
   >>> He just bounces from room to room !   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> so much for not talking about snit ,   
   >> snit is right you can't do it   
   >   
   > And Snot Michael Glasser engages in *every* thread in which he is   
   > mentioned and mocked.   
   >   
   > I haven't seen any other Usenet participant who incites so much mockery   
   > and negative attention.   
      
   Or lies as much as snit does. Or peecent as well in this case. There's a   
   huge difference in directly responding TO snit vs freely writing ABOUT   
   snit.   
      
   Please see the post below which explains *exactly* what some of us are   
   upto. Consider joining us? :)   
      
   MID:    
   From: Gremlin    
   Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop   
   Subject: Recruiting: Anti-Snit Coalition ROFLMFAO!   
   A public service announcement by...Grem. :-)   
      
   I am recruiting for the Anti-Snit Coalition. Please see below.    
      
   Consider that snit knows now he's fucked up in a major way here with the   
   majority of us. Snit's desperate for attention since the majority of us   
   are either no longer providing any, or have considerably reduced what we   
   will provide on rations that snit isn't doing well with These new threads   
   are designed to feed snit; but disguised as you can see. I say, for what   
   it's worth, let's let the motherfucker go hungry for a bit.   
      
   It's not like he hasn't earned a little bit of childish treatment. We've   
   all tried treating him like a reasonable adult; some much more so than   
   others (Apd!). He has the mental capacity of a child. And, he's   
   demonstrated many times now that his reading comprehension is stuck on at   
   best a 5th graders reading level. A 5th grader in special ed for reading   
   comprehension that is. So, let's just proceed to treat him as the child   
   like adult snit actually is. Let's agree to continue to discuss some   
   things? that snit posts, but, exclude snit from the conversation itself.   
   As in, hit reply to get the ball rolling, but don't directly address snit   
   in any of your reply; this will allow us to respond to each other, so that   
   we can discuss what snit wrote that was preserved.   
      
   We simply deny him the attention he lives on. Sound like a plan? Plus, you   
   know the shit this reply is going to stir up. It should be good for at   
   least 20 replies; and a couple of accusations of my ganging up on him and   
   asking others to join me. That alone makes it worth doing.    
      
   This has been a public service announcement by...GreM.    
      
   --   
   I don't need no Dr. All I need...is my lawyer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)