home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 107 
 empty@suit.wh to All 
 Re: LOL..."No transcripts Barry" shows t 
 31 Jan 19 19:20:08 
 
Path:
eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september
.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-septemb
er.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: no hope or change 
Newsgroups:
az.politics,tx.politics,dfw.politics,va.politics,fl.politics,misc.survivalism
Subject: Re: LOL..."No transcripts Barry" shows the entire world how pathetic
 he is by begging for another term.
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:34:10 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 51
Message-ID: 
References: 
<0vo058tnftd1at7tg7gfrmj7gvof3p0ojl@4ax.com> 
 
 
 
 
 

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 03:34:02 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="8941bcfbda27852b7cb58e19415d7258";
 logging-data="4228"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zLAu02a+tASCsotlgMb9BVWfCiHYyZ+Y="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120824
Thunderbird/10.0.7
In-Reply-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+TZ+cq/XKlkRanRQ85pt+1PnhyU=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org az.politics:2452 tx.politics:607
dfw.politics:256 va.politics:83 fl.politics:57 misc.survivalism:22490

On 9/14/2012 9:31 PM, ? wrote:
> Are these the dead ones you dug up yourself

Did you think you could _ever_ post enough to keep up with me?

LOL!

Enjoy again, +old+ man:




http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/time_for_democrats_for_romn
ey_AUZ6cjhzmQwugmwm4pEt6J

Almost all of my friends are Democrats; all of them voted for Barack 
Obama in 2008.

Ask them these days, as I have, if they plan to vote for Obama this 
November, and they’ll give you an “Oh shucks” sad smile, look down, look 
back up with guilty eyes and say “I’m disappointed.”

Then they play the party line and say. “But Romney? But Ryan?”

I’m not talking about those African Americans, Latinos and lockstep 
Democrats who’ll blindly vote for Obama no matter how high unemployment 
may be or what shape this country may be in.

I’m talking about a good number of intelligent, caring, middle-class 
Democrats who are a soft nudge away from casting their vote for Romney.

All they need to know is that they’re not alone.

Democrats were disappointed in 1980. They’d had, under President Jimmy 
Carter, four years of inflation, unemployment and gas rationing. Yet, 
when asked, they said, “But Reagan?”

At this point in 1980, Carter was nine points ahead of Ronald Reagan in 
the polls. Reagan had been slimed by the press and pro-Jimmy Carter 
forces as being dumb and bumbling. Sound familiar?

Carter treated Reagan as a ridiculous figure who, among other things, 
was ignorant of details of nuclear-weapons policy. Reagan cheerfully 
promised economic growth and asked Democrats, “Are you better off than 
you were four years ago?”

In the end, Reagan proved that good-natured conservatism could win by 
huge margins. But a lot of credit for the win must go to “Democrats for 
Reagan.”


https://www.facebook.com/DemocratsForMittRomney
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
 * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx  //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca