Just a sample of the Echomail archive
TREK:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 18,955 of 20,897  |
|  Wickeddoll to All  |
|  Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?  |
|  09 Dec 09 17:48:17  |
 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos From Address: not@chance.dude Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One? Steven L. wrote: GeneK wrote: >> "A Watcher" wrote in message >>> Isn't a point of the latest movie? Changing their past changed the >>> characters we knew in the original ST. Now they can go on and make new >>> movies based on these different characters. There's no end to it. >>> >>> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who are really into ST. >> >> It's THE point of the movie, i.e., "this is why our new Trek is different >> from the old Trek but still fits into canon." But casual viewers couldn't >> care less about canon, and for longtime viewers, "this is a reimagining >> of Trek with a new canon" would be probably be explanation enough >> for a good film and "fitting into canon" won't redeem a bad one. >> GeneK > > This movie vindicated MY position on the future of Trek, which I had > stated here before (check the Google archive): > > Star Trek does NOT require the original actors, nor the original sets, > nor the original ship models, nor the original props. The basic concept > would work with any actors and any type of ship (as long as it was large > enough to hold a varied crew). > > Critics have to deal with the passage of time: James Doohan is gone, > DeForest Kelley is gone, and the other actors are quite old now--too old > for any more swashbuckling derring-do. If a TOS-type series is to have > ANY future, it HAS to be rebooted from a new cast of actors. Otherwise > the only other alternative is to let Star Trek die off once and for all. > > I doubt that Abrams' critics would be happy about that. If production > of the movie had fallen through for any reason, they would be the first > ones lamenting that "TOS is dead, too bad." > > > > -- > Steven L. > > They're *still* saying it's dead. May they grieve in peace, cuz I'm looking forward to the next film. Natalie -- "Wicked little doll, you have no soul" (David Byrne, 1997) http://www.supernaturalusa.net --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca