Just a sample of the Echomail archive
TREK:
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 18,958 of 20,897  |
|  A Watcher to All  |
|  Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One?  |
|  09 Dec 09 18:11:56  |
 From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos From Address: stocksami@earthlink.net Subject: Re: Star Trek: Am I the Only One? Wickeddoll wrote: > Steven L. wrote: > GeneK wrote: >>> "A Watcher" wrote in message >>>> Isn't a point of the latest movie? Changing their past changed the >>>> characters we knew in the original ST. Now they can go on and make new >>>> movies based on these different characters. There's no end to it. >>>> >>>> Of course that will confuse the casual viewers who are really into ST. >>> >>> It's THE point of the movie, i.e., "this is why our new Trek is >>> different >>> from the old Trek but still fits into canon." But casual viewers >>> couldn't >>> care less about canon, and for longtime viewers, "this is a reimagining >>> of Trek with a new canon" would be probably be explanation enough >>> for a good film and "fitting into canon" won't redeem a bad one. >>> GeneK >> >> This movie vindicated MY position on the future of Trek, which I had >> stated here before (check the Google archive): >> >> Star Trek does NOT require the original actors, nor the original sets, >> nor the original ship models, nor the original props. The basic >> concept would work with any actors and any type of ship (as long as it >> was large enough to hold a varied crew). >> >> Critics have to deal with the passage of time: James Doohan is gone, >> DeForest Kelley is gone, and the other actors are quite old now--too >> old for any more swashbuckling derring-do. If a TOS-type series is to >> have ANY future, it HAS to be rebooted from a new cast of actors. >> Otherwise the only other alternative is to let Star Trek die off once >> and for all. >> >> I doubt that Abrams' critics would be happy about that. If production >> of the movie had fallen through for any reason, they would be the >> first ones lamenting that "TOS is dead, too bad." >> >> >> >> -- >> Steven L. >> >> > > They're *still* saying it's dead. > > May they grieve in peace, cuz I'm looking forward to the next film. > > Natalie "They" don't have to watch. They can keep watching reruns of TOS. --- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (1:2320/105.97) --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1) |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca