home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 20563 
 Wiseguy to All 
 Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves aroun 
 10 Apr 14 17:02:48 
 
From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: epwise@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth

"Adam H. Kerman"  wrote in
news:li5663$pg0$1@news.albasani.net: 

> David Johnston  wrote:
>>On 4/9/2014 6:20 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>David Johnston   wrote:
>>>>On 4/9/2014 5:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:
>>>>>>On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:
>>>>>>>>On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Joe Pfeiffer  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Adam H. Kerman"  writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>David Johnston  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Let the furious backpedalling begin!
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>It is not backpedalling to deny holding a position that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>one never claimed to hold.
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>She knew she was working for Robert Sungenis and what his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>reputation was.  So, yeah, "I don't stand behind the work I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>was just paid for" is backpedalling.
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>She's a compensated spokesman, literally. Wrong again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Johnston. 
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>From shawn 's quote of her
>>>>>>>>>>>>statement: 
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>subscribe to anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>science and history and, had I known of his involvement,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>would most certainly have avoided this documentary. I was a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>So she says she didn't know she was working for Sungenis.
> 
>>>>>>>>>>>yeah, that seems unlikely.  I mean, it's *possible* but it
>>>>>>>>>>>would take a really concerted effort on Sungenis' part to
>>>>>>>>>>>hide his identity, and why?
> 
>>>>>>>>>>No, it wouldn't.  All it would require is for him to deal with
>>>>>>>>>>her on a corporate basis.  And there's no way she would have
>>>>>>>>>>known who the hell he was if his name happened to come up
>>>>>>>>>>anyway. 
> 
>>>>>>>>>I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,
> 
>>>>>>>>But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling.  You
>>>>>>>>couldn't just immediately hear the name and know he was a
>>>>>>>>nutbar. 
> 
>>>>>>>Nice backpedal, Johnston.
> 
>>>>>>From what?
> 
>>>>>From the excuses you were making for her.
> 
>>>>No I haven't backpedaled from them at all.  I still think she had no
>>>>idea who had hired her.
> 
>>>That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston.
> 
>>Sure it was the issue.  The original post was claiming Mulgrew was the
>>stupidest woman alive because she "endorsed" geocentrism.
> 
> Nice backpedal, Johnston. We've been over this time and again. She's
> LITERALLY paid to endorse Robert Sungenis' ideas.

Yes, over and over.

How many times do you have to be told you're wrong?
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
 # Origin: TeraNews.com (1:2320/105.97)
 * Origin: CCO BBS - capitolcityonline.net:26 (1:2320/105)

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca