Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 20654  |
|  Eric Oulashin to Frank Linhares  |
|  Re: Thought on Discovery  |
|  11 May 19 10:46:07  |
 TZUTC: -0700 MSGID: 17301.fido_trek@1:340/7 213c83f4 REPLY: 1:229/101 511a46ca PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Win32 May 4 2019 MSC 1800 TID: SBBSecho 3.07-Win32 r3.114 May 4 2019 MSC 1800 COLS: 80 Re: Re: Thought on Discovery By: Frank Linhares to Eric Oulashin on Fri May 10 2019 09:41 pm FL> I think he was only referring to his half sister with records to never FL> speaking of them again, I don't remember anything about Discovery as a FL> whole. Then again, I have been known to be wrong from time to time, lol. Maybe that's right, I don't remember for sure now. FL> They also never explained this difference between the Klingon's on TOS and FL> TNG. I'd be more curious about that difference since they are both in the FL> same time line. Yes actually, they did explain that (at least, to an extent). And the new Klingon look actually started with The Motion Picture, not TNG. It was explained in the TV series 'Enterprise'. They explained it as some genetic manipulations the Klingons were doing to themselves, based on what humans were doing to produce a group of super-humans, which included Khan. There was a 3-part episode in Enterprise where one of Soong's ancestors (also played by Brent Spiner) was continuing the work to create more super-humans, and I think the Klingons got wind of it and tried introducing some of the human super-genes into themselves, which is why the Klingons looked more human in TOS. I don't remember offhand how the Klingons went back to their regular look by The Motion Picture/TNG, but at least that explains why they looked more human in TOS. Nightfox --- SBBSecho 3.07-Win32 * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (1:340/7) SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 2 19/36 34/999 90/1 104/57 106/201 116/18 120/331 SEEN-BY: 123/140 153/7715 218/700 222/2 226/16 17 229/101 200 275 SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 728 1014 230/150 152 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 SEEN-BY: 250/1 261/38 100 266/512 267/155 275/100 280/464 282/1031 SEEN-BY: 282/1056 291/1 111 292/854 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 340/400 SEEN-BY: 342/13 200 393/68 396/45 633/0 267 280 640/1384 712/620 848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 801/189 2320/105 3634/12 5020/1042 PATH: 340/7 400 261/38 712/848 633/280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]