TZUTC: -0700
MSGID: 17368.fido_trek@1:340/7 23933d0a
REPLY: 2:240/8001.19@fidonet e728f27d
PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Win32  Jun 26 2020 MSC 1925
TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Win32 r3.173 Jun 26 2020 MSC 1925
CHRS: ASCII 1
-=> Benjamin Toussaint wrote to All <=-

 BT> Hello everyone,

 BT> recently I started watching the series on Prime. Before I have been
 BT> listening to the audio book which appeared to be a totally different
 BT> story line (although the story itself is the same).

 BT> Still it is not like the Star Trek I used to love (TNG, DS9, VOY)
 BT> although it has quite a lot of nostalgia moments.

 BT> What I always loved about "my" ST was that it showed a world that I
 BT> wanted to live in. And of course the exploring of new people, stars and
 BT> technologies among with ethical and philosophical implications.

 BT> Except for Picard both following Series were f*****g prequels. That I
 BT> find opposing to the look at the future.

 BT> How did you percieve Picard?

I gave Picard a try after downloading a torrent. After a few episodes I gave
up. To me it is an empty shell of TNG. I would do a complete review but that
would require a complete viewing of the season. 

Like the reboot movies, the show is made for young people who grew up without
Star Trek. The franchise is done with, if you ask me. At least I have the dvd
collections of TOS, TNG, and DS9. I liked Voyager despite the rushed finale
season.

During his promo tour of the talkshow circuit, Stewart said that the show would
be specifically written to combat Trump. I knew it was going to be a steaming
pile of turds. I'm surprised he didn't cast DeNiro.

Star Trek died with Roddenberry.

Daniel Traechin

... Visit me at gopher://gcpp.world
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
 * Origin: Digital Distortion: digdist.synchro.net (1:340/7)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/131 226/30 227/114 229/100 101 275
SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 664 240/5832 249/206 317 292/854 317/3 322/757
SEEN-BY: 342/200 633/280
PATH: 340/7 400 261/38 320/219 203/0 280/464 229/101 426