TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A47
MSGID: 2:250/5 bb379585
REPLY: 11691.trek@1:218/700 2555c0a2
TZUTC: 0100
 KW> -=> Chris Krascek wrote to DaveW <=-
 KW> 
 KW>  CK> wanted.. and I'm still trying to figure out why. I think a big portio
 KW>  CK> of that is how new and modern things look... after many years of trek
 KW>  CK> In all fairness TOS fans prob felt that way with TNG.
 KW> 
 KW> I liked the progression from TOS -> TNG, but I wanted Enterprise to look 
 KW> much more primitive. The design of NX-01 looked like a 200 year newer
 KW> Akira- class ship, and the interiors felt too new. I would have liked
 KW> those little gooseneck viewers on the helm as a callback to the TOS
 KW> pilot Enterprise.  :)

Yes, that was my issue with that series too. In fact, this is in part why I
didn't really care too much for ST reboot. I was thinking something more
primitive.. simplistic. I suppose its hard to go backwards when the tech and
know how is far more advanced.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2020/12/04 (Linux/64)
 * Origin: thE qUAntUm wOrmhOlE, rAmsgAtE, uK. bbs.erb.pw (2:250/5)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 25/0 21 30/0 80/1 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340
SEEN-BY: 123/131 129/305 218/700 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/101 424
SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 550 700 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 250/0
SEEN-BY: 250/1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 21 261/38 263/0 280/464 282/464 1038
SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/0 1 101 113 123 812 317/3 322/757 335/364 341/66
SEEN-BY: 342/200 633/280 920/1 5058/104
PATH: 250/5 1 301/1 229/426