Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 334  |
|  Rob Swindell to Marc Lewis  |
|  Re: No compression to one node  |
|  31 Oct 18 04:33:17  |
 
Re: Re: No compression to one node
By: Marc Lewis to Torsten Bamberg on Tue Oct 30 2018 07:08 pm
> TB> If you want to sent netmail without compression, do a 'squish out'
> TB> without 'squash'.
>
> Yes, and the same is true for an EchoMail outbound scan, but the outbound
> directory would become a nightmare. It's a Binkley style outbound and
> Binkley doesn't recognise uncompressed packets IIRC;
BSO recognizes/supports uncompressed packets (e.g. outbound/*.out) just fine.
> MarK Lewis pointed out that now-a-days it hardly makes sense to waste
> compute cycles to archive outbound packets due to the connectivity via the
> internet now
> commonly utilised; but still, there are traditional Binkley based mailers
> that require compressed mail bundles with their attendant .?LO files.
That would weird considering the original Binkley mailer (BinkleyTerm) did not
(require compressed mail bundles).
digital man
Synchronet "Real Fact" #83:
Donations to the Synchronet project are welcome @ http://wiki.sy
chro.net/donate
Norco, CA WX: 68.9øF, 16.0% humidity, 5 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.06-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]