REPLY: 2:280/464.47 6007e760
MSGID: 3:633/267.7 602c6c24
CHRS: LATIN-1 2
TZUTC: 1100
TID: hpt/fbsd 1.9.0-cur 2018-12-08
On 20 Jan 21 09:18:48, Oli (2:280/464.47) wrote to All:

 Ol> Is there a known bug with the SQUISH LINK command? Message linking
 Ol> doesn't work properly on my Linux armv7 build. It seems to link every
 Ol> message to the previous and the next, but only if there is a REPLY
 Ol> kludge. Looks like this in Golded:

 Ol> [...]

 Ol> Any ideas? Does this happen on DOS, OS/2 or Windows too or is it a
 Ol> Linux specific bug?

MSGID/REPLY threading worked well in the original 1.11 release on DOS & OS/2.

I can't vouch for the Linux port of Squish. I don't think it got a lot of
testing. Among other things you might have C structure alignment/padding
inconsistencies on ARM that weren't present on the i386 build.

I recall Bob Jones disappeared from Fido only a few years after porting
Maximus (which included Squish) to Linux in 2003.

Maybe it was Scott Dudley in disguise! Probably not.

These days I think everyone using Squish bases on Linux/BSD are using Husky's
HPTLINK. I vaguely recall HPTLINK is a bit more intelligent than SQUISH LINK
anyway.

--- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20180707
 * Origin: X (3:633/267.7)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 129/305 226/30 227/114
SEEN-BY: 227/702 229/101 424 426 550 664 1016 1017 240/5832 249/206
SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 292/854 317/3 322/757 342/200 633/0 267 280 281
SEEN-BY: 633/412 416 509 640/1384 712/848
PATH: 633/267 280 229/426