home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 1085 
 August Abolins to Cem Uzunoglu 
 Re: Are QWK packets still the way? 
 26 Dec 25 03:08:14 
 
MSGID: 2:221/360.0 694ddffa
REPLY: 386.fidonet_tuxpower@1:105/45 2db2fbc1
PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20251012
NOTE: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32)
CHRS: CP437 2
TZUTC: 0200
On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 13:09:50 -0800
"Cem Uzunoglu -> All" <0@45.105.1> wrote:

 CU> Hi all,
 CU> It's been a very long time away from the BBS scene. What is the
 CU> fastest/user friendliest way to participate in FidoNet nowadays? Is
 CU> downloading  QWK packages still the way to go? Any other more practical
 CU> methods you use?
 CU> --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
 CU>   * Origin: 4d2 dot org // bbs.4d2.org // +1 541 442 4422 (1:105/45)

I'd say *this* (nntp) method is "easiest".

But most of the time, I use OpenXP (see https:/openxp.kolico.ca)

--- 
 * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/360.0)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/10 37 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/187 129/14
SEEN-BY: 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10 110 203/0 218/700 840 221/1 6
SEEN-BY: 221/360 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 300 317 400 426
SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 664 700 705 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006
SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757 762 335/364 341/66
SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca