Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1085  |
|  August Abolins to Cem Uzunoglu  |
|  Re: Are QWK packets still the way?  |
|  26 Dec 25 03:08:14  |
 MSGID: 2:221/360.0 694ddffa REPLY: 386.fidonet_tuxpower@1:105/45 2db2fbc1 PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 kco 20251012 NOTE: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) CHRS: CP437 2 TZUTC: 0200 On Thu, 25 Dec 2025 13:09:50 -0800 "Cem Uzunoglu -> All" <0@45.105.1> wrote: CU> Hi all, CU> It's been a very long time away from the BBS scene. What is the CU> fastest/user friendliest way to participate in FidoNet nowadays? Is CU> downloading QWK packages still the way to go? Any other more practical CU> methods you use? CU> --- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux CU> * Origin: 4d2 dot org // bbs.4d2.org // +1 541 442 4422 (1:105/45) I'd say *this* (nntp) method is "easiest". But most of the time, I use OpenXP (see https:/openxp.kolico.ca) --- * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/360.0) SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/10 37 105/81 106/201 123/130 128/187 129/14 SEEN-BY: 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10 110 203/0 218/700 840 221/1 6 SEEN-BY: 221/360 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 300 317 400 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 470 664 700 705 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 SEEN-BY: 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757 762 335/364 341/66 SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26 SEEN-BY: 5075/35 PATH: 221/6 1 320/219 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]