Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1095  |
|  Maurice Kinal to Alan Ianson  |
|  Are QWK packets still the way?  |
|  26 Dec 25 15:49:55  |
 REPLY: 1:153/757.0 f2d8125a MSGID: 1:153/7001 694eaea3 CHRS: UTF-8 4 Hey Alan! > I still think QWK or offline mail is the way to go. I agree with offline mail but definetly *NOT* QWK ... or bluewave while we're at it. However given the lack of suitable client/server applications I can readily understand the attraction of multimail QWK / Synchronet ftp setup. Personally I think the idea requires a total overhaul. Дуже груви, Maurice o- -o -o -o o- o- -o o- o- -o o- o- /) (\ (\ (\ /) /) (\ /) /) (\ /) /) ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... WARNING: Mixing perogies with LSD may cause a bad trip to Vegreville. --- GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001) SEEN-BY: 50/22 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 134/100 SEEN-BY: 153/135 143 148 151 153 757 7001 7715 154/10 30 110 203/0 SEEN-BY: 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 134 206 300 317 SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 263/1 266/512 SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 460/58 256 1124 5858 633/280 712/848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 902/26 3634/12 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 153/7001 757 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]