Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1099  |
|  Tanausu M. to Maurice Kinal  |
|  Are QWK packets still the way?  |
|  26 Dec 25 16:52:24  |
 REPLY: 1:153/7001 694eaea3 MSGID: 2:341/207.1 694ebdb7 CHRS: UTF-8 2 TZUTC: 0000 TID: CrashMail II/Linux 1.5.1 Hello Maurice! 26 Dec 25 15:49, you wrote to Alan Ianson: MK> I agree with offline mail but definetly *NOT* QWK ... or bluewave MK> while we're at it. However given the lack of suitable client/server MK> applications I can readily understand the attraction of multimail QWK MK> / Synchronet ftp setup. MK> Personally I think the idea requires a total overhaul. Yes, if you're not interested in network emails, NNTP is fine and simple. --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20250409 * Origin: Citrick BBS citlmbbs.synchro.net (2:341/207.1) SEEN-BY: 50/22 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 SEEN-BY: 229/110 112 134 206 300 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1 SEEN-BY: 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 200 207 234 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 460/58 256 1124 5858 633/280 712/848 770/1 902/26 5020/400 SEEN-BY: 5020/8912 5054/30 5075/35 PATH: 341/207 66 280/464 460/58 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]