Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1103  |
|  August Abolins to Maurice Kinal  |
|  Are QWK packets still the  |
|  26 Dec 25 14:41:00  |
 MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet 27cc703b REPLY: 1:153/7001 694eb0fb PID: OpenXP/5.0.64 (Win32) CHRS: ASCII 1 TZUTC: -0500 Hello Maurice! ** On Friday 26.12.25 - 15:59, Maurice Kinal wrote to Cem Uzunoglu: MK> Excellent choice. nvim should have no issues with utf-8 MK> but I can't say the same for either QWK or Bluewave MK> honouring utf-8 characters. I honestly believe a new MK> offline format is required. No one seems to be interested in building a new offline packet system. Maybe a new packet system that supports some utf-8 and integrated with a local message management database system would be quite nice for people who are primarily interested in just the echomail from any FTN-based system. Oh wait.. it already exists - it's called OpenXP! :D As for "supports some utf-8", it's primarily limited what the DOS terminal [char sets or font seletion] system can do or not. Oh.. another system that *does* claim to support a broader implementation for utf-8 is WinPoint. -- ../|ug --- OpenXP 5.0.64 * Origin: (2:221/1.58) SEEN-BY: 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187 129/14 153/757 7715 SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 110 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/112 134 206 300 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1 SEEN-BY: 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 384 410 414 418 420 422 509 2744 712/848 770/1 SEEN-BY: 902/26 5020/400 5075/35 PATH: 221/1 280/464 633/280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]