Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1160  |
|  Maurice Kinal to August Abolins  |
|  shiney new binkd  |
|  14 Jan 26 17:45:35  |
 REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet 286d3cf1 MSGID: 2:280/464.113 6967d63f CHRS: UTF-8 4 Hej August! > that means you are building that source using 2017 C standard gcc > support not the 2023 C standard based gcc default.... Exactly. > That may mean that gcc developers are getting sloppy, No it doesn't. Without overthinking this, it means that the binkd source isn't quite up to speed as far as c standards are concerned and that gcc provides backwards compatibilty via the -std switch. > there is an inherent code issue that they are tripping over. No. It compiles fine by using older c standards without having to revert to an older gcc release. If anything it is the binkd maintainer(s) who are behind the times. On the plus side it is a very easy fix and as luck would have it gnu17 can produce a vastly more capable strftime than gnu99, especially with regards to rfc-3339 formatted output such as below; |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]