MSGID: 1:154/10 65e4903e
REPLY: 1:153/7001 65e3f65e
PID: Smapinntpd/Linux 2.0 b20240302
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: -0600
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:02:38 GMT, Maurice Kinal -> Nicholas Boel wrote:

 MK> It looks good here.  If it added a "Re: ", like some so-called FTN
 MK> software does, then it would have stripped bytes from the rightmost
 MK> which in this case is wrong since the rightmost is the beginning not the
 MK> end.  I believe the "Re: " thingy is a QWK standard and not really a FTN
 MK> standard that I am aware of.  I could be wrong about this but I don't
 MK> believe so.

I'm not sure where it's a standard, but it changes the original
subject/message, which I don't think is a good thing in any case. Most
software I use here has an option to add or not add "Re: ", and I
disable it everywhere.

 MK> Bottomline is your software can properly handle utf-8 codes no matter
 MK> where (msg_header in this case) or the msg_body.  You have my seal of
 MK> approval ... for what it's worth.  :-)

Worth every penny. ;)

Regards,
Nick

... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
 * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/616 123/10 124/5016
SEEN-BY: 128/260 135/225 153/757 7001 7715 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0
SEEN-BY: 214/22 218/0 1 601 700 820 840 850 860 870 880 930 940 220/90
SEEN-BY: 221/0 6 226/18 30 70 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 307 317
SEEN-BY: 229/400 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848
SEEN-BY: 770/1 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 154/10 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426