REPLY: 1:153/7001 679fa5c6
MSGID: 1:154/10 679fb9f2
CHRS: UTF-8 4
TZUTC: -0600
TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02
Hey Maurice!

On Sun, 02 Feb 2025 17:05:10 , you wrote ..

 >> That seemed abnormally quick.

 > Not really.  According to kernel.org;

 > mainline:   6.13          2025-01-19
 > stable:     6.13.1        2025-02-01

But then you had 6.12.11 on Jan 23 and 6.12.12 on Feb 1 in between? What's the
reasoning with all that?

 > I haven't had a chance to check.  It just so happened to present itself
 > (6.13.1) when I was upgrading one of the four machines I am working on.
 > So far twon of them are both running 6.12.11 since 6.12.12 hadn't
 > presented itself until yesterday, which was after I upgraded them to
 > 6.12.11.  I still have one more machine to get up to date, and it will
 > probably be a 6.12.12 kernel which is listed as 'stable'.

I'm guessing 6.12.x is still receiving security patches or something while
6.13.x is now currently being worked on? I don't know their versioning scheme,
which is the only reason I'm asking.

Regards,
Nick

... He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20240309
 * Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
SEEN-BY: 103/705 104/119 105/81 106/201 120/616 124/5016 128/187 153/757
SEEN-BY: 153/7001 7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 203/0 218/700 220/20 90
SEEN-BY: 221/0 6 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 206 300 317 400
SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66
SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 460/58 467/888 633/267 280 384 410
SEEN-BY: 633/418 509 2744 712/848 770/1 902/26 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400
SEEN-BY: 5075/35
PATH: 154/10 280/464 633/280 229/426