XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.america   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: remailer@domain.invalid   
      
   >   
   > On 4/6/2018 10:01 AM, bigdog wrote:   
   >> It is really hard to understand that people cannot understand   
   that the first clause which states the purpose of the amendment in   
   no way limits the second clause which unequivocally states that the   
   right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. My   
   late father was a linguist who on numerous occasions was called to   
   testify in court about the meaning of the words in a statute or a   
   contract. He was also a life long liberal but even he didn't   
   interpret the Second Amendment as limiting RKBA to service in a   
   militia.   
   >>   
   >   
   > "A" militia is a military force comprised of temporary, non-   
   professional   
   > soldiers drawn from the community to carry out some military   
   action.   
      
   Because Democrat have traditionally run and hid from any duty or   
   responsibility to their country.   
      
   > "The" militia, as envisioned by the American founders, was the   
   population of   
   > able-bodied persons (assumed then to be only males) who could be   
   called out for   
   > such a purpose.   
      
   It was necessary to keep the women alive so the victors would have   
   females to rape and propagate the superior genetics of the victors.   
      
   Weak males like modern day Democrats have no use and need to be   
   quickly disposed of.  Shoot them and leave them rot where they fall   
   as a lesson to other weaklings.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)