XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.america   
   XPost: sac.politics   
   From: carmax@gmail.com   
      
   Rudy Canoza Neodome Forger  wrote in   
   news:20210424.222114.d8de5b1b@mixmin.net:   
      
   >>   
   >> On 4/6/2018 10:01 AM, bigdog wrote:   
   >>> It is really hard to understand that people cannot understand   
   > that the first clause which states the purpose of the amendment in   
   > no way limits the second clause which unequivocally states that the   
   > right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. My   
   > late father was a linguist who on numerous occasions was called to   
   > testify in court about the meaning of the words in a statute or a   
   > contract. He was also a life long liberal but even he didn't   
   > interpret the Second Amendment as limiting RKBA to service in a   
   > militia.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> "A" militia is a military force comprised of temporary, non-   
   >> professional soldiers drawn from the community to carry out some   
   >> military action.   
   >   
   > Because Democrat have traditionally run and hid from any duty or   
   > responsibility to their country.   
   >   
   >> "The" militia, as envisioned by the American founders, was the   
   >> population of able-bodied persons (assumed then to be only males) who   
   >> could be called out for such a purpose.   
   >   
   > It was necessary to keep the women alive so the victors would have   
   > females to rape and propagate the superior genetics of the victors.   
      
   Democrat victors, humorously assuming that there could ever be such a   
   thing, are prone to rape males - including the dead ones.   
      
   > Weak males like modern day Democrats have no use and need to be   
   > quickly disposed of.  Shoot them and leave them rot where they fall   
   > as a lesson to other weaklings.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)