Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    tx.politics    |    Texas politics    |    122,019 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 121,228 of 122,019    |
|    Intelligent Party to All    |
|    Whose Right Is It, To Say, SEX Isn't For    |
|    21 Aug 22 08:28:05    |
      XPost: fl.politics, houston.politics, az.politics       XPost: alt.abortion, talk.abortion       From: Intelligent@savetheworldmsn.com              Who's?              Remember, whenever you're advocating pedo rights, to say "for the record, we       fully       condemn child abuse," and we do.              This is not an advocation to have sex with children, however such an       advocation is       100% fully legal under the Brandenburg test. (you may as well say this too).              Three ways that sex with Children is NOT okay:              1. Police officer to prisoner sex (Guardian/Ward = Warden/Ward) compelled by       implied threat of punishment = rape.              2. Sexual assault of any age is sexual assault, whether Harvey Weinstein to       Rose       McGowan, or a pedo who just goes right for the french kiss or crotch without       sufficient indication of interest from his or her target.              3. Mentally incompetent toddlers under three years old cannot consent any more       than someone in a walking coma or a sleeping adult.                     If someone were to legally upset someone's parents, by legal sex with their       descendant, the parents could re-advise the descendant. They should, however,       be       slut pride, and not slut shame.                     Just because someone has sex once, certainly means, they do not need to repeat       it,       if they didn't like it.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca