Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    tx.politics    |    Texas politics    |    122,019 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 121,786 of 122,019    |
|    14th Amendment to All    |
|    Federal judge in Texas says agency creat    |
|    07 Mar 24 01:23:25    |
      XPost: alt.discrimination, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.n       tionalism.white       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: fu-dei-racists@texas.us              A federal judge in Texas said Tuesday that a US Commerce Department agency       intended to help minority-owned businesses must offer assistance to all       individuals, regardless of race, agreeing with White business owners who       claimed that its policies were unconstitutional.              The ruling from US District Judge Mark Pittman, an appointee of former       President Donald Trump, stems from a lawsuit brought by several White       business owners against the Minority Business Development Agency, which is       “dedicated to the growth and global competitiveness of minority business       enterprises,” according to its website.              Pittman said that the agency had violated the equal protection clause of       the Constitution’s 14th Amendment through its reliance on a statutory       presumption that members of certain minority groups are “‘socially or       economically disadvantaged’ and … thus entitled to services.” The list of       groups includes African Americans, Asian Americans, Latino Americans and       Native Americans, among others.              The judge permanently barred the agency from “considering or using an       applicant’s race or ethnicity in determining whether they can receive”       assistance from one of the agency’s dozens of business centers, which help       businesses with things like securing funding and competing for contracts.              “Plaintiffs all encountered the same obstacle when they sought MBDA       programming. Because they aren’t on the Agency’s magic list, the Agency       presumes they aren’t disadvantaged,” Pittman wrote.              “If courts mean what they say when they ascribe supreme importance to       constitutional rights, the federal government may not flagrantly violate       such rights with impunity,” the judge wrote. “The MBDA has done so for       years. Time’s up.”              The MBDA is one of the only federal agencies focused exclusively on       developing and advocating for minority-owned businesses. The Nixon       administration established it in 1969 as a division of the US Department       of Commerce and it was later enshrined into federal law in 2021.              In recent years, conservatives have increasingly turned to federal courts       in Texas to challenge certain federal programs and actions. The Fort Worth       division of the Northern District of Texas, where Pittman is one of just a       few sitting judges, has become an especially favored venue given its       conservative tilt. In the past, Pittman has issued controversial rulings       on the Biden administration’s student debt relief policy and a state law       that banned people ages 18 to 20 from carrying handguns in public.              “To the extent the MBDA offers services pursuant to an unconstitutional       presumption, that’s fifty-five years too many,” Pittman said in his latest       ruling. “Today the clock runs out. ‘Yesterday is not ours to recover, but       tomorrow is ours to win or lose.’”              Tuesday’s ruling underscores the impact of the Supreme Court’s landmark       decision last year that said colleges and universities could no longer       take race into consideration as a specific basis for granting admissions.       Pittman cited the court’s majority opinion in that case, writing that       although it “concerned college admissions, nothing in the decision       indicates the Court’s holding should be constrained to that context.”              The US Supreme Court is seen in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2024.              “Like Harvard’s program in SFFA, the MBDA sees ‘an inherent benefit in       race qua race – race for race’s sake,’” he wrote. “Such disregard for the       necessity of race or for race-neutral alternatives is unconstitutional.”              The plaintiffs at the center of the case were three White business owners       who were denied MBDA services. They sued the agency in March 2023 and       Pittman last year temporarily blocked their local business centers from       denying them assistance as the lawsuit played out. His new order applies       to the agency nationwide.              In court papers, Justice Department attorneys representing MBDA pushed       back against the plaintiffs’ claims, saying, “Any member of a group not       presumed socially or economically disadvantaged may petition for a       presumption of disadvantage, regardless of race.”              “And while the application process may vary for individuals not included       in the MBDA presumptions, there is a pathway for them to access the       services of the MBDA Business Centers through an assertion of individual              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca