home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 245 
 Denise Stevens to All 
 SUBJECT: A WEE BIT ON CROP CIRCLES  
 02 Dec 25 07:33:31 
 
TZUTC: -0500
MSGID: 350.fidonet_ufo@1:3634/60 2d9413f9
PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan  2 2022 MSC 1928
TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan  2 2022 MSC 1928
BBSID: RICKSBBS
CHRS: UTF-8 4
SUBJECT: A WEE BIT ON CROP CIRCLES                           FILE: UFO1210 



                              5/20/90
                          By Bryon Smith

           Strange Things are Afoot at the "Circle (R)"
            O*****[============- -============]*****O

      One thing that I know for sure is that "you never can be to
 sure" what is  going  on  and  what  the  truth  really is about
 certain things.

      Just a few days ago my little sister called me on the phone
 and said "I am returning your call."   I  set there for a moment
 and said "what ?"  She said that I had called her  that  morning
 just before 8am and that she had just gotten the message and was
 returning my call.   Quickly  I  questioned myself and recounted
 all of my actions that morning up to that very moment and I said
 "I haven't called anyone this morning,  in fact I have only been
 on the phone  once this morning and that was to  answer  a  call
 from the wife,  and  this  is  the second time on the phone this
 morning."

      Gina didn't think long about  what  I  had  said before she
 came back with a "well it sure sounds like you on  the recording
 and it gave this same number."

      Well it  was  my number all right.  She played the tape for
 me and I took a recording of it.   Sure  enough it was my voice,
 and I had  even  give the time of the call and  my  voice  phone
 number both of which were correct.  It was just as if I had made
 the call, only one small catch, I had not made that call.

      Her answering  machine is computerize and counts the number
 of calls that  come into her office  and  it  had  counted  that
 message as a new call.

      That morning she came into the office before 8am and had
 3 messages on the first part of the tape.  She listened  to them
 and then reset  the  tape as she always does every morning.  The
 machine always records right over  the  top of the last messages
 unless you tell it to save the message.  She left the office for
 a little bit  and  came  back and checked and the  machine  said
 there were two new messages and she played them back.  There was
 my voice as  big  as  life, it gave the time and made mention of
 our elder sister who is deceased  as  if  she  were still alive.
 This made me think it was an old message, but the  tape had been
 recorded over, it had run several other messages over the top of
 any old messages  that might have been at the start of the tape.
 If that had been an old message  it  would  have  been from last
 December and that would have made it at least 4 months old.  The
 next thing is  that the computer counts all of  the  calls  that
 come in since the last time they were reviewed and it said there
 was two new calls which counted "my" message as a new call.

      The next  message  after  "mine"  was  from her husband and
 after it the machine gave the date  and  time  of  the call.  We
 noticed that after my message it had not given the date and time
 after the call but it was my voice that had given  the  time  of
 the call.  This was unusual to say the least.  It had counted it
 as a call,  yet had not posted the time and date after the call.
 It played it and counted it as a  call  so why didn't it put the
 time and date after it as it normally does ?  Right  after  that
 was her husband and it counted the time and date as normal.

      How could  an old message come through an old tape as if it
 were a new message ?  How could  the  computer count it as a new
 call and not put the time and date after the call  ?   The  time
 was right on  the  money  and  was  given  by "my voice."  Had I
 actually made the call the machine  would  have  placed the time
 and date after the call and there would have been  little  doubt
 that I had made the call myself and just "forgotten about it" or
 perhaps was lying  and  saying that I had not made the call when
 in fact I had.  The oddity itself  indicates  that something out
 of the normal  had taken place though and gave certain  evidence
 to prove that  I  was  telling the truth and I had not made that
 call.

      The fact that her husband had  called right after my "call"
 had proven very  close  to  the  fact  when the  call  had  been
 recorded and it was right in the correct time slot.

      I told  her  of  a UFO crash that had not been to many days
 ago at which  certain people had  gathered  to  talk  about  the
 event.  Certain other people were seen and some  even  talked to
 others there and  later when they were contacted by these people
 about the crash they knew nothing  about it.  They said they had
 not been there at all and could prove it.  So  how  is  it these
 other people swear that they saw and even talked with certain of
 these other people  if they were not there ?  And what about the
 UFO crash ?  Did the thing just  up  and  vanish without a trace
 and with no other "media" reports ?  Was it as if  it  had never
 actually happened ?  If so then what did happen ?

      So strange  things are afoot at the "Circle (R)" and if you
 see or hear from someone who later  says  they were not there or
 had not tried  to  contact  you,  and don't know  what  you  are
 talking about don't be surprised.

      ...Bryon

              
  **********************************************
  * THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo *
  **********************************************

Denise
telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
 * Origin: Rick's BBS - telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23 (1:3634/60)
SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 50/22 105/81 106/201 123/0 126 180 525 755 3001
SEEN-BY: 123/3002 124/5016 128/187 129/14 305 153/757 7715 154/30
SEEN-BY: 154/110 203/0 218/700 220/6 221/0 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/110
SEEN-BY: 229/112 134 317 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/1120 5832 250/1
SEEN-BY: 263/1 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1
SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124
SEEN-BY: 460/5858 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 902/26 2320/105 3634/0
SEEN-BY: 3634/12 56 57 60 5020/400 8912 5054/30 5075/35
PATH: 3634/60 12 222/2 263/1 280/464 460/58 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca