Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    uk.media.tv.sf.drwho    |    Another Dr. Who discussion forum    |    81,972 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 80,025 of 81,972    |
|    Hornplayer9599 to Blueshirt    |
|    Re: Doctor Who S15/S2 - Ep 3: The Well    |
|    26 Apr 25 20:10:08    |
      XPost: rec.arts.drwho       From: Hornplayer9599@aol.com              On 4/26/2025 05:05, Blueshirt wrote:              >       > Overall I'd go with a 7/10 for "The Well"... I thought it was as       > good as last week's episode in some ways, better in others, but       > different in tone and much more like "Doctor Who" should be.              I'll go along with that. That being said, what I was not very keen on       is how the story was structured...meaning how the story was written.       This story was written in the same fashion that a large number of New       Who stories have been written: straight forward, simplistic, and not       much plot development (no "swerves"...the story unfolds as one would       expect). This makes the stories formulaic and predictable which causes       even a decent story to become dull...simply because you can see the       "next step" in the story from a mile away. Lazy writing rearing its       head again.              I'll talk Andor after I've seen Eps. 2 & 3. :)                            --              Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.       --Carl Sagan              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca