XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Hornplayer9599   wrote:   
   >On 4/26/2025 05:05, Blueshirt wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Overall I'd go with a 7/10 for "The Well"... I thought it was as   
   >> good as last week's episode in some ways, better in others, but   
   >> different in tone and much more like "Doctor Who" should be.   
   >   
   >I'll go along with that.  That being said, what I was not very keen on   
   >is how the story was structured...meaning how the story was written.   
   >This story was written in the same fashion that a large number of New   
   >Who stories have been written: straight forward, simplistic, and not   
   >much plot development (no "swerves"...the story unfolds as one would   
   >expect).  This makes the stories formulaic and predictable which causes   
   >even a decent story to become dull...simply because you can see the   
   >"next step" in the story from a mile away.  Lazy writing rearing its   
   >head again.   
   >   
   >I'll talk Andor after I've seen Eps. 2 & 3. :)   
   >   
   >   
      
   You say 7?   
      
   >   
   >--   
   >   
   >Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.   
   >--Carl Sagan   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)