XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: daniel47@eternal-september.org   
      
   On 3/05/2025 12:40 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:   
   > On 5/2/2025 09:19, The Doctor wrote:   
   >> In article ,   
   >> Hornplayer9599   wrote:   
   >>> On 5/1/2025 06:30, Daniel70 wrote:   
   >>>> On 27/04/2025 9:01 pm, Mickmane wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Are there any online rumours with actual facts backing it up, or just   
   >>>>> hopes and speculations?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Isn't the very definition of a Rumour that it is NOT based on FACT??   
   >>>   
   >>> Not necessarily.  A rumor can be factual...just that the fact(s) are as   
   >>> yet unverified.   
   >>>   
   >>> For example, one of the other band directors in my area just accepted   
   >>> the band director position at another school.  And while it was true,   
   >>> and some of us knew that he had taken the position, it wasn't announced   
   >>> publicly (official verification) by both schools that he had done so for   
   >>> another 3 weeks.   
   >>   
   >> Loosely based on fact.   
   >   
   > No, completely based on fact.  My colleague had, in fact, been offered   
   > and accepted the new position three weeks prior to it being announced   
   > publicly by the respective boards of education for each school district   
      
   So, IMHO, not a rumour but a LEAK!!   
   --   
   Daniel70   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)