XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.fandom
XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article <9779.57442081.06700@debitislmiag.moulkhire.us.com>,
wrote:
>In article <102a38b$1fem2$1@dont-email.me>, tppm@rr.ca.com wrote:
>> On 6/6/2025 12:07 AM, Theory11 wrote:
>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:36:06 +0000, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>> blueshirt@indigo.news wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Hopefully Rose is a placeholder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From what I heard, it was a stunt to convince Disney to pay
>>>>>> for another season ("Look at the ratings! People want to see
>>>>>> another season!").
>>>>>
>>>>> Well... if the alternative is "Doctor Who" being cancelled, I
>>>>> want to see another season, regardless of the ratings.
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather have no Doctor Who than bad Doctor Who.
>>>
>>> The simplest alternative is to avoid watching a television program that
>>> has deteriorated in quality to the stage where it is deemed "bad" by
>>> parts of its fandom.
>>>
>>
>>I agree, those people who think it's bad, should stop watching it. I,
>>for one, will continue watching, and mostly enjoying, it, assuming these
>>grumps haven't gotten it canceled.
>
>A few years ago, I might have been upset or opinionated about this or had
>some kind of a reaction. Now, it just makes me scratch my head and go on
>with my day only to forget it in about 20 minutes.
>
Only Timeless Child lovers will defend this trash.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
