XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   On 2025-10-23 08:54:24 +0000, Daniel70 said:   
   > On 23/10/2025 7:49 am, Your Name wrote:   
   >> On 2025-10-22 09:53:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:   
   >>> Your Name wrote:   
   >   
   >    
   >   
   >>>> But that's a mis-calcualtion. If you take the show back to   
   >>>> it's proper version, then Jo Martin, Jodie Whittaker, and   
   >>>> Ncuti Gatwa don't count at all. There's also no evidence that   
   >>>> Billie Piper is the new Doctor (semi-permanent or temporary).   
   >>>> Paul McGann doesn't count either and possibly neither does   
   >>>> John Hurt.   
   >>>   
   >>> Well, if we're going down that road... nobody after Tom Baker   
   >>> counted, so there!!!   
   >>>   
   >>>> Then there's Peter Cushing, although he's a different "Doctor   
   >>>> Who" entirely ... supposedly.   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm happy to include him, somewhere... timey wimey and all   
   >>> that...   
   >>   
   >> Peter Cushing's character was not a Time Lord. He was simply a human   
   >> inventor. At best he was an "alternate universe Doctor Who".   
   >   
   > Ah!! So in the Peter Cushing Doctor Who Universe not only the   
   > Gualifreans can "DO" Time and Space travel but Humans CAN do it too!!   
   >   
   > Time and Space Travel must be as common as muck!!   
      
   I don't think there are any Gallifreyans in those movies (it's been a   
   long long time since I saw them) - that's why it's not real "Doctor   
   Who".   
      
   There is some fan concoted nonsense idea that those movies were made by   
   an actor and that the real Time Lord Doctor Who we know from the TV   
   series had agreed to them being made.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)