XPost: rec.arts.drwho
From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org
On 24/10/2025 9:28 am, Your Name wrote:
> On 2025-10-23 08:54:24 +0000, Daniel70 said:
>> On 23/10/2025 7:49 am, Your Name wrote:
>>> On 2025-10-22 09:53:26 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>>>> Your Name wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> But that's a mis-calcualtion. If you take the show back to
>>>>> it's proper version, then Jo Martin, Jodie Whittaker, and
>>>>> Ncuti Gatwa don't count at all. There's also no evidence that
>>>>> Billie Piper is the new Doctor (semi-permanent or temporary).
>>>>> Paul McGann doesn't count either and possibly neither does
>>>>> John Hurt.
>>>>
>>>> Well, if we're going down that road... nobody after Tom Baker
>>>> counted, so there!!!
>>>>
>>>>> Then there's Peter Cushing, although he's a different "Doctor
>>>>> Who" entirely ... supposedly.
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to include him, somewhere... timey wimey and all
>>>> that...
>>>
>>> Peter Cushing's character was not a Time Lord. He was simply a human
>>> inventor. At best he was an "alternate universe Doctor Who".
>>
>> Ah!! So in the Peter Cushing Doctor Who Universe not only the
>> Gualifreans can "DO" Time and Space travel but Humans CAN do it too!!
>>
>> Time and Space Travel must be as common as muck!!
>
> I don't think there are any Gallifreyans in those movies (it's been a
> long long time since I saw them) - that's why it's not real "Doctor Who".
>
> There is some fan concoted nonsense idea that those movies were made by
> an actor and that the real Time Lord Doctor Who we know from the TV
> series had agreed to them being made.
>
Sorry!! When you type "the real Time Lord Doctor Who", you do mean the
TV production company, don't you??
--
Daniel70
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
