Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    uk.media.tv.sf.drwho    |    Another Dr. Who discussion forum    |    81,972 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 81,222 of 81,972    |
|    solar penguin to All    |
|    Re: Happy 62 Doctor Who    |
|    28 Nov 25 09:59:21    |
      XPost: rec.arts.drwho       From: solar.penguin@gmail.com              The True loon’s lack of logic loomed larger:              > On 26/11/2025 09:23, solar penguin wrote:              You forgot to change it to ‘solar imbecile’! Please try harder!              >>       >> The True loon twisted himself into loops:       >>       >>> On 25/11/2025 12:19, solar penguin wrote:       >>>>       >>>> Who says the laser reflectors, moon buggies, etc. were       >>>> still in the same positions as before? I don’t remember that       >>>> in the episode.       >>>       >>> Because that's where they are now       >>       >> But will they continue to be there after 2049?       >>       >       > We were shown images of the face of the re-formed moon with the exact       > same craters in the exact same places they are now.       >              And that is a real problem with the episode. The craters aren’t       a natural part of the moon, but the result of meteors hitting it.              You should’ve gone with that instead of nonsense about NASA’s       lunar junk.              >>> If they were so much as a millimetre out of place then the whole       >>> world would have been completely unrecognisable.       >>>       >>       >> I think the other events of the episode would change the world       >> far more than the position of some lunar junk.       >       > Wrong. You demonstrate that you have no understanding of Chaos Theory.       >              You demonstrate that you have no understanding of your own       posts. Further down you ask: “Why wasn't the Earth thrown out       of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes and huge tidal waves       and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew away?”              That would have a _much_ bigger effect than NASA no longer       knowing where its moon junk is!              >>       >> Did RTD specifically say that Liz Shaw was on the moon during       >> the specific events of this specific episode?       >>       >       > He said she was based on the Moon during the Sarah Jane Adventures.       >       >> And if he did, how did he know? This was long after he left the       >> show. His personal opinion doesn’t change anything.       >       > It's mentioned at the end of the SJA episode he wrote featuring Matt Smith.       >              That was around 2010. ‘Kill the Moon’ is set in 2049. This gives       Liz nearly 40 years to return from the moon and die of old age       or whatever.              >>       >>>>       >>>> With all the real problems in that episode, why make up       >>>> fake ones?       >>>>       >>>       >>> It's not a fake one. Any episode where you gain wight in free fall       >>> instead of becoming weightless violates the laws of physics, and       >>> therefore this episode is not part of Doctor Who.       >>       >> That’s a _different_ problem. It has nothing to do with lunar junk       >> or Liz Shaw.       >       > It's still a problem with the episode              And you should’ve gone with that instead of your made-up       fake problems.              > which means that nothing from that       > episode onwards can be considered to have actually happened.              No, it means that this was a disappointing episode. In a show       that’s lasted as long as Doctor Who, there are always bound to       be some disappointing episodes, just by the law of averages.              > There is no possible way to suspend disbelief.       >              Your imagination is too small. I can think of at least two ways       to do it.              >>       >> (It’s also another fake problem. Doctor Who has been violating       >> physics ever since that police box turned out to be bigger on       >> the inside! Why start making a fuss about it now?)       >>       >       > The reason why the TARDIS is bigger on the inside has been explained       > multiple times including at the start of The Robots of Death, therefore       > there is suspension of disbelief. It also does not affect anything on       > Earth.       >              So a bit of handwaving technobabble years after the problem is       enough to solve it.              If a future episode has a line saying that space dragons’ ovaries       extend into a parallel dimension, would that be enough to bring       ‘Kill the Moon’ and everything that follows back into canon?              > Why wasn't the Earth thrown out of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes       > and huge tidal waves and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew       > away?              Yes, that’s a real problem. You should’ve gone with that instead       of Liz Shaw and NASA’s junk.              --       solar penguin              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca