XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: solar.penguin@gmail.com   
      
   The True loon lost what little logic he once laid claim to:   
      
   > On 28/11/2025 09:59, solar imbecile wrote:   
      
   That’s better. Can’t beat a bit of light-hearted banter to stop   
   things getting too serious.   
   >>   
   >> The True Doctor wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> We were shown images of the face of the re-formed moon with the exact   
   >>> same craters in the exact same places they are now.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> And that is a real problem with the episode.   
   >>   
   >> You should’ve gone with that instead of nonsense about NASA’s   
   >> lunar junk.   
   >   
   > I already said that when I stated that the moon looked exactly the same   
   > as it did before. Learn to read you infant.   
      
   Says the man who clearly couldn’t read what he was replying to.   
      
   I said you should’ve gone with the craters ‘instead of’ NASA’s junk   
   not ‘as well as’.   
      
   There’s a difference.   
      
   > Meteor craters are not   
   > something man made. Laser reflectors, rocket stages, and moon buggies   
   > are, and therefore impossible to reproduce without human intervention.   
      
   So the obvious conclusion that they weren’t replaced, and the   
   new post-2049 moon doesn’t have them any more.   
      
   That’s why this isn’t a real problem outside your own imagination.   
      
   > You demonstrate that you have no understanding of anything you stupid   
   > infant and have no idea of how to reason. I listed all the reasons why   
   > the story was totally undeliverable.   
      
   By ‘all’ you mean the real reasons and your fake, made-up ones.   
      
   Maybe just stick with the real reasons in future.   
      
   BTW it wasn’t all. You missed out the biggest problem with   
   the story.   
      
   >>   
   >> And you should’ve gone with that instead of your made-up   
   >> fake problems.   
   >   
   > I went with all of them you imbecilic, stupid, degenerate moron,   
      
   You really don’t understand the difference between ‘instead of’   
   and ‘as well as’, do you?   
      
   > since all are equally valid failings.   
   >   
      
   The real reasons are valid. Your fake, made-up ones aren’t.   
      
   >   
   >>> Why wasn't the Earth thrown out of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes   
   >>> and huge tidal waves and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew   
   >>> away?   
   >>   
   >> Yes, that’s a real problem. You should’ve gone with that instead   
   >> of Liz Shaw and NASA’s junk.   
   >>   
   >   
   > I went with all of them you stupid, infantile, degenerate, moronic,   
   > imbecile. You ain't fooling anyone who has intelligence trying to worm   
   > your way out.   
   >   
      
   That’s the third time in a row you’ve failed to understand ‘instead   
   of’. Making a habit of that, aren’t you..?   
      
   --   
   solar penguin   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)