XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article <10gkcjo$1ese7$1@dont-email.me>,   
   solar penguin   wrote:   
   >   
   >The True loon lost what little logic he once laid claim to:   
   >   
   >> On 28/11/2025 09:59, solar imbecile wrote:   
   >   
   >That’s better. Can’t beat a bit of light-hearted banter to stop   
   >things getting too serious.   
   >>>   
   >>> The True Doctor wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> We were shown images of the face of the re-formed moon with the exact   
   >>>> same craters in the exact same places they are now.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> And that is a real problem with the episode.   
   >>>   
   >>> You should’ve gone with that instead of nonsense about NASA’s   
   >>> lunar junk.   
   >>   
   >> I already said that when I stated that the moon looked exactly the same   
   >> as it did before. Learn to read you infant.   
   >   
   >Says the man who clearly couldn’t read what he was replying to.   
   >   
   >I said you should’ve gone with the craters ‘instead of’ NASA’s junk   
   >not ‘as well as’.   
   >   
   >There’s a difference.   
   >   
   >> Meteor craters are not   
   >> something man made. Laser reflectors, rocket stages, and moon buggies   
   >> are, and therefore impossible to reproduce without human intervention.   
   >   
   >So the obvious conclusion that they weren’t replaced, and the   
   >new post-2049 moon doesn’t have them any more.   
   >   
   >That’s why this isn’t a real problem outside your own imagination.   
   >   
   >> You demonstrate that you have no understanding of anything you stupid   
   >> infant and have no idea of how to reason. I listed all the reasons why   
   >> the story was totally undeliverable.   
   >   
   >By ‘all’ you mean the real reasons and your fake, made-up ones.   
   >   
   >Maybe just stick with the real reasons in future.   
   >   
   >BTW it wasn’t all. You missed out the biggest problem with   
   >the story.   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> And you should’ve gone with that instead of your made-up   
   >>> fake problems.   
   >>   
   >> I went with all of them you imbecilic, stupid, degenerate moron,   
   >   
   >You really don’t understand the difference between ‘instead of’   
   >and ‘as well as’, do you?   
   >   
   >> since all are equally valid failings.   
   >>   
   >   
   >The real reasons are valid. Your fake, made-up ones aren’t.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>> Why wasn't the Earth thrown out of orbit and ripped apart by earthquakes   
   >>>> and huge tidal waves and tsunamis when 90% of the mass of the moon flew   
   >>>> away?   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, that’s a real problem. You should’ve gone with that instead   
   >>> of Liz Shaw and NASA’s junk.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> I went with all of them you stupid, infantile, degenerate, moronic,   
   >> imbecile. You ain't fooling anyone who has intelligence trying to worm   
   >> your way out.   
   >>   
   >   
   >That’s the third time in a row you’ve failed to understand ‘instead   
   >of’. Making a habit of that, aren’t you..?   
   >   
      
      
   This sounds like something I see from the USA.   
      
   >--   
   >solar penguin   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   Merry Christmas 2025 and Happy New Year 2026   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)