XPost: rec.arts.drwho   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article <10kgr83$898e$1@solani.org>,   
   StanWeiss wrote:   
   >On 1/17/2026 2:00 PM, The True Melissa wrote:   
   >> Verily, in article <10kgafu$7tjj$1@solani.org>, did srweiss1@comcast.net   
   >> deliver unto us this message:   
   >>> On 1/16/2026 11:48 PM, The True Doctor wrote:   
   >>>> On 16/01/2026 16:08, The Doctor wrote:   
   >>>>> Newton's Personal Biblical Views   
   >>>>> Sir Isaac Newton was himself a deeply religious man who   
   >>>>> spent more time studying the Bible than science. He believed:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Called himself a scientist but was ignorant enough to believe that   
   >>>> Adam and his decedents up to Noah lived from between 900 and 700 years   
   >>>> each. Couldn't figure out that the bible refers to these ages in lunar   
   >>>> months not regular years, despite Newton having read Piny the Elder   
   >>>> (since Pliny's Natural History is what Newton based his own Natural   
   >>>> History on) who explains all this to him. Why didn't Pliny come up   
   >>>> with Mavity instead of Newton. Obviously unlike Newton, Pliny was not   
   >>>> Indian.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Another ignoramus who also read and quoted Pliny was Eusebius who also   
   >>>> believed the same nonsense despite attacking Roman historians for   
   >>>> giving their kings reigns of up to 400 years.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> The laws of nature were established by God and reflect His wisdom and   
   >>>>> power.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Then how can God exist before he established the laws of nature in a   
   >>>> vacuum?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> He viewed his scientific discoveries as a way to "think God's thoughts   
   >>>>> after Him," revealing the underlying order of the creation.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> If it's all down to mathematics when why did Newton need a god anyway?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> All you need to do is calculate the value of Pi and there's God for you.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> He wrote extensively on biblical prophecy, particularly   
   >>>>> the books of Daniel and Revelation.   
   >>>> Did he manage to figure out that Daniel was written during the   
   >>>> Hellenistic period and therefore was concocted after the events that   
   >>>> Daniel is supposed to predict occurred, most of which dealt with   
   >>>> battles fought between the Ptolemys and Seleucids? Did he also   
   >>>> understand that Revelation concerns the Medeao-Persian conquest of   
   >>>> Babylon and Cyrus promise to rebuild Jerusalem for the Jews and send   
   >>>> them back to it, which occurred about 600 years before it was written?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Are Newton's religious works actually authentic or are they forgeries?   
   >>>>   
   >>> Doesn't the Sumerian King List, have some of them living for thousands   
   >> A Babylonian king is said to have reigned for twelve thousand years.   
   >> Mainstream historians believe that these ancient people simply didn't   
   >> record the names of old kings unless they really stood out and made a   
   >> difference. If they didn't, it was just lumped into the last standout   
   >> king's reign.   
   >>   
   >> I guess that would be equivalent to saying Obama was President for 12   
   >> years, though for 4 of them it was really Biden.   
   >>   
   >Sometime mainstream historians have their own ideas, and get shock when   
   >something comes along and upsets their apple cart. Like man back then   
   >couldn't have built it, but yet there is Gobeklitepe.   
   >   
   >Stan   
   >   
      
   Gobeklitepe?   
      
   >--   
   >This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.   
   >www.avast.com   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   Birthdate 29 Jan 1969 Redhill surrey England   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|