Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 299  |
|  Sergey Dorofeev to Nicholas Boel  |
|  UTF-8 nodelist report  |
|  15 Mar 25 04:27:02  |
 MSGID: 2:5020/12000 4f539241 REPLY: 1:154/10 67d4c548 TZUTC: 0300 CHRS: UTF-8 4 Hello Nicholas, orig.message to echo UTF-8 on 14 Mar 25 18:52:22 NB> This is true, however.. that's the fault of those sysops. I've found the NB> best working method has been to 'assume' any message with *no* chrs kludge NB> is CP437, since it probably comes from a BBS package with ANSI support. Not so easy for me. At first, I must distinguish CP866 and CP437. At second, there is a little fraction of messages with latin-1 encoding - not so serious, but some symbols got trashed if wrong charset choosed. There was messages in encoding that I call "fido-relics" - with 8D byte used as soft-CR. And some amount of messages with encodings such as CP1125 - if decoded as CP866 some letters are displayed wrong. Using that fact that each echo area has own language - I use per-echo default encodings. Sergey ... vim --- PyFTN * Origin: fluid.fidoman.ru (2:5020/12000) SEEN-BY: 4/0 50/109 90/0 105/81 106/201 128/187 153/7715 154/110 218/700 SEEN-BY: 221/1 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 114 317 426 428 470 700 705 SEEN-BY: 280/464 291/111 301/1 113 812 320/219 341/66 234 900/0 902/0 SEEN-BY: 902/26 905/0 5015/46 5020/715 830 848 1042 2065 4441 12000 SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 1474 5058/104 5061/133 5097/31 PATH: 5020/12000 4441 1042 301/1 341/66 902/26 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]