home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

 Message 40016 
 COD Weather Processor to wx-storm@lists.illinois.edu 
 HVYRAIN: Excessive Rainfall Discussion 
 03 Jan 26 15:51:57 
 
TZUTC: 0000
MSGID: 168219.weather@1:2320/105 2dc10242
PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0
BBSID: CAPCITY2
CHRS: ASCII 1
FORMAT: flowed
FOUS30 KWBC 031551
QPFERD

Excessive Rainfall Discussion
NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD
1051 AM EST Sat Jan 3 2026

Day 1
Valid 16Z Sat Jan 03 2026 - 12Z Sun Jan 04 2026

...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ACROSS PORTIONS OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AND IN THE UPSLOPE REGIONS OF THE SIERRA AND=20
THE SHASTA OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA...

16z Update: Only minor changes needed to the inherited risk areas.
Rainfall rates over portions of Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties
are expected to increase this morning resulting in an isolated to
scattered flash flood risk. Mudslides and debris flows will also=20
be a possibility. Recent satellite imagery depicts cooling cloud=20
tops moving into this portion of southern CA. Rainfall as high as=20
0.75" in an hour is already occurring on a localized basis, with=20
recent HRRR runs supporting amounts locally exceeding 1" in an hour
between now and 22z as this axis of heavier rain gradually shifts=20
southward. Given observational and model trends it seems probable=20
that rates will continue to increase as embedded convective=20
elements develop just onshore. Current indications are that this=20
area of heavier rainfall rates will weaken as it moves into Las=20
Angeles County, although 0.5"/hr rainfall will still be possible=20
here.

Convective elements may also increase across portions of central=20
and northern CA as we head into the afternoon resulting in a=20
localized flash flood risk. The coverage of these higher rates=20
should be pretty low, so not looking at a widespread flash flood=20
risk. But if/where heavier convective cells do develop then urban=20
and small stream flooding will be possible.

Chenard

...Previous Discussion...

The axis of anomalous 850-700 mb moisture flux values...2 to 4+
standard deviations above the mean...along and ahead of the inland
moving frontal boundary early Saturday will impact the upslope
areas of the Sierra, northward into the Shasta of northern
California and spread through the Transverse Ranges of Southern
California. The primary change from the previous outlook was to
expand the slight risk area along all of the upslope regions of the
Sierra and expand it northward into the upslope of the northern CA
Shasta Range. HREF and RRFS neighborhood probabilities are high in
the slight risk area along the Sierra into the Shasta for 1, 2 and
3"+ totals and high along the Transverse Range for 1 and 2"+
totals day 1. In the slight risk area along the Sierra and Shasta,
hourly rainfall totals of .25-.50"+ are possible through the day 1
period and along the Transverse Range primarily during the first
half of day 1. This is resulting in HREF and RRFS probabilities of 3
hour precip exceeding 3 hour FFG values being well defined in the
upslope area of the Sierra and Shasta through day 1 and over the
Transverse Range during the fist half of day 1. Soils remain fairly
saturated in the slight risk areas from recent heavy rains at the
end of 2025 with runoff issues possible as additional heavy
rainfall occurs over these saturated soils.


Oravec

Day 2
Valid 12Z Sun Jan 04 2026 - 12Z Mon Jan 05 2026

...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL FOR PORTIONS OF THE
NORTHERN SIERRA...

Additional shortwave energy expected to rotate through the mean
trof position along the West coast and inland across California day
2. This will support a continued wet showery pattern with
additional moderate to locally heavy precip totals along much of
the California coast Ranges and into the upslope of the Sierra. A
small slight risk area was introduced in the upslope of the northern
Sierra where model consensus is for potential of additional 1 to 2"
of rain. While rainfall rates are expected to be less than day 1,
generally .10-.25, there will be overlap with the day 1 qpf axis in
places with 48 hour totals of 3-6" in the slight risk area. Much
of the day 2 precip will occur during the first half of day 2. HREF
and RRFS 12 hour precip ending 0000 UTC Mon are high for 1 and 2"+
totals. Otherwise, no changes made to the broad marginal risk area
for much of coastal and northern California.

Oravec


Day 3
Valid 12Z Mon Jan 05 2026 - 12Z Tue Jan 06 2026

...THERE IS A MARGINAL RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ALONG THE CENTRAL
TO NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COAST AND NORTHERN CALIFORNIA...

The mean trof position is maintained day 3 off the West coast with
model consensus for amplification of a new closed low in the base
of the mean trof off the Central to Southern CA coast. The low
level southerly flow on the east side of this developing closed low
will not be as strong as the day 1 and 2 low level south
southwesterly flow, resulting in 850-700 mb moisture flux values
only 1 to 1.5 standard deviations above the mean. PW values also
expected to be lower than day 1 and 2, with anomalies only 1 to
1.5 standard deviations above the mean. Model consensus is for
additional .50-1"+ rainfall amounts along the Central to Northern
CA coast and into the upslope of the Northern Sierra. At the
moment, these amounts warrant keeping the Excessive Rainfall
Outlook threat level at marginal for the day 3 period, with no
significant changes made to the previous outlook.

Oravec


Day 1 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go=
v/qpf/94epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!5PWWpbnkl9pgbgqnfuy7Yi85OYfOcThdZjuLWD8i9kaX=
10743uN3ty7V_cQA5gmJ-rqU5cQMaFCHZVdrFpAl0Gs7Xc0$=20
Day 2 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go=
v/qpf/98epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!5PWWpbnkl9pgbgqnfuy7Yi85OYfOcThdZjuLWD8i9kaX=
10743uN3ty7V_cQA5gmJ-rqU5cQMaFCHZVdrFpAl9MVQQY8$=20
Day 3 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go=
v/qpf/99epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!5PWWpbnkl9pgbgqnfuy7Yi85OYfOcThdZjuLWD8i9kaX=
10743uN3ty7V_cQA5gmJ-rqU5cQMaFCHZVdrFpAltRh4a58$=20

=3D =3D =3D
To unsubscribe from WX-STORM and you already have a login, go to
https://lists.illinois.edu and use the "Unsubscribe" link.  Otherwise email
Chris Novy at cnovy@cox.net and ask to be removed from WX-STORM.

--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
 * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105)
SEEN-BY: 1/19 100 16/0 19/10 37 104/119 105/81 106/201 114/10 120/302
SEEN-BY: 123/130 128/187 129/14 142/104 153/757 7715 154/10 30 50
SEEN-BY: 154/110 700 201/0 203/0 218/700 840 220/10 20 30 90 221/1
SEEN-BY: 221/6 360 226/18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 134 206 275 300
SEEN-BY: 229/307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 240/5832 266/512
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 291/111 301/1 320/119 219 319 2119 322/757 762 326/101
SEEN-BY: 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 423/81 460/58 633/280 712/848
SEEN-BY: 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5020/400 5075/35
PATH: 2320/105 154/10 221/6 1 320/219 229/426


<< oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]

(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca