Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 40087  |
|  COD Weather Processor to wx-storm@lists.illinois.edu  |
|  HVYRAIN: Excessive Rainfall Discussion  |
|  06 Jan 26 00:26:30  |
 TZUTC: 0000 MSGID: 168290.weather@1:2320/105 2dc41e23 PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.28-Linux master/123f2d28a Jul 12 2025 GCC 12.2.0 BBSID: CAPCITY2 CHRS: ASCII 1 FORMAT: flowed FOUS30 KWBC 060026 QPFERD Excessive Rainfall Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 726 PM EST Mon Jan 5 2026 Day 1 Valid 01Z Tue Jan 06 2026 - 12Z Tue Jan 06 2026 ...THERE IS A MARGINAL RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL ALONG THE CENTRAL TO NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COAST AND NORTHERN CALIFORNIA... 01Z Update... Late afternoon radar imagery supported the reasoning detailed below and that only minor adjustments were needed to the Marginal Risk area across north-central California. Satellite imagery suggested the elongation of the closed mid-level low was underway and that the overall flow pattern should become more parallel to the coast as shown by the models. Until then...locally moderate to heavy rainfall into mid- or late-evening on top of soil already at or=20 near saturation may still result in flooding of creeks, streams, and low-lying areas. Bann 16Z update... The forecast reasoning in the previous discussion remains valid and only minor adjustments were made to the existing Marginal Risk across north-central California. The primary shortwave embedded within the longwave trough in the eastern Pacific was centered near 128W and will advance closer to the north-central California coast between Point Arena and San Francisco Bay through 00Z. After 00Z, the closed mid-level low will elongate and weaken as it moves southward offshore of the coast. There is good model agreement in this forecast and the corresponding low level wind field becoming largely parallel to the central California coast overnight while weakening. The main concern for heavy rain related impacts will be prior to 03Z Tuesday where isolated hourly rainfall of 0.50 to 0.75 inches primarily focused along the Coastal Ranges toward the San Francisco Bay region later today with isolated hourly totals near 1 inch possible. East of the Coastal Ranges, peak hourly rainfall up to ~0.50 inches is expected. Additional peak rainfall through 12Z Tuesday will be in the 2-4 inch range Otto ...previous discussion follows... Upper disturbance off the California coast will meander to the southeast closer to the coastal plain, eventually pinching off the mean trough centered to the north and closing off into an ULL as it migrates down near the latitude of the Bay area. Proximity of the disturbance and prevailing flow will send a modest IVT pulse (300-400 kg/ms) crashing into the northern CA coastal plain with some minor protrusion of the IVT signature inland with a secondary QPF maxima forecast around the Trinity Mountains over into Shasta National Forest domain. Hi-res deterministic output is pretty consistent with the axis of heaviest precip focused from the King Range down towards Santa Rosa, north of the Bay area with the latest HREF EAS probs for 1" running between 60-90% for much of that location with another prob max focused near Mount Shasta. The main threat for this setup is easily over any urbanized zones and remnant burn scars across northern CA leading to mainly a lower-end flash flood concern in the grand scheme of the setup. IVT signature is one that historically yields more isolated flash flood threats with the primary focus typically aimed at that coastal urban centered from the Bay area up towards Eureka, and over the northern valley locations like Redding. This is where the MRGL risk was maintained during the forecast as the trend for the southern edge of any heavy rain prospects south of San Jose has all but disappeared on guidance. It's still something we'll monitor for any last minute trends back, but guidance favors mainly the area north of the Bay at this time. Total QPF for the impacted areas will be between 1.5-3" with a max between 4-5" for the coastal ranges north of the Bay area, and over the Shasta National Forest. Kleebauer Day 2 Valid 12Z Tue Jan 06 2026 - 12Z Wed Jan 07 2026 The probability of rainfall exceeding flash flood guidance is less than 5 percent. Fracasso Day 3 Valid 12Z Wed Jan 07 2026 - 12Z Thu Jan 08 2026 The probability of rainfall exceeding flash flood guidance is less than 5 percent. Fracasso Day 1 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go= v/qpf/94epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!7d_JWs6vbl9-pUD-z1JIXl3WfmjtMfgEruYtZmjhtr6j= Nt4fb6rij8vEw0PGmYBh8e9PJ9w17MtvhVGFdzw8nXWQnbY$=20 Day 2 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go= v/qpf/98epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!7d_JWs6vbl9-pUD-z1JIXl3WfmjtMfgEruYtZmjhtr6j= Nt4fb6rij8vEw0PGmYBh8e9PJ9w17MtvhVGFdzw8x0exAaM$=20 Day 3 threat area: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.go= v/qpf/99epoints.txt__;!!DZ3fjg!7d_JWs6vbl9-pUD-z1JIXl3WfmjtMfgEruYtZmjhtr6j= Nt4fb6rij8vEw0PGmYBh8e9PJ9w17MtvhVGFdzw8Lb25Xns$=20 =3D =3D =3D To unsubscribe from WX-STORM and you already have a login, go to https://lists.illinois.edu and use the "Unsubscribe" link. Otherwise email Chris Novy at cnovy@cox.net and ask to be removed from WX-STORM. --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: Capitol City Online (1:2320/105) SEEN-BY: 19/10 104/119 105/81 106/201 114/10 120/302 128/187 129/14 SEEN-BY: 153/757 7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 218/700 840 220/10 20 30 SEEN-BY: 220/70 90 221/1 6 360 226/17 18 30 44 50 227/114 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/134 206 275 300 307 317 400 426 428 470 664 700 705 266/512 SEEN-BY: 267/800 291/111 301/1 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 342/200 SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 100 340 350 772/210 220 SEEN-BY: 772/230 902/26 2320/0 105 304 3634/12 5020/400 5075/35 PATH: 2320/105 154/10 221/6 218/840 770/1 633/280 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]