Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 1055  |
|  Joe Martin to Strahinja Bojovic  |
|  Wildcat 4.12 y2 fix  |
|  04 Nov 19 17:46:23  |
 MSGID: 1:104/57.0 4ec95a37 PID: ViaMAIL! v2.00 90-0001 -> JM>I had a look at the files you send me and the .OVR file has the -> JM>11/28/1995 04:12 time stamp on it which is about right, but the .E -> JM>a more recent date. Can you send me the .EXE with a matching time -> JM>(as the .OVR) on it? -> -> JM>It's possible MSI used RTPatch with that version and it didn't upd -> JM>the time stamp properly. Seems weird though that it did work fine -> JM>.OVR file. -> -> JM>The reason I ask is that I applied the patch (as I do for the othe -> JM>versions) but it still has issues. I have gone over this with a -> JM>fine-toothed comb and it should work. I just want to ensure I'm -> working -> JM>with the correct file(s). -> -> I send you .exe file that runs BBS, is it good idea to send you -> one in install archive? Do you recall how your version "got to" v4.12? Was RTPatch used to upgrade it? I just need an original EXE/OVR file combination. If that's all you have, I can work with it. I just wanted to make sure I was working on an "untouched/unmodified" version since it will be the basis for all others with v4.12. Regards, Joe Martin --- ViaMAIL!/WC v2.00 * Origin: ViaSoft Support BBS - Back online at 303-953-0568 (1:104/57) SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 2 19/36 34/999 90/1 102/401 103/705 104/57 SEEN-BY: 106/201 116/18 120/331 123/140 153/7715 203/0 218/0 1 109 SEEN-BY: 218/210 215 401 410 520 601 700 720 802 810 221/0 222/2 227/114 SEEN-BY: 229/354 426 1014 230/150 152 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 250/1 SEEN-BY: 261/38 100 266/512 267/155 275/100 280/464 282/1031 1056 SEEN-BY: 291/1 111 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 340/400 342/13 200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 633/280 640/1321 712/848 801/161 189 2320/700 3634/12 5020/1042 PATH: 104/57 261/38 218/700 103/705 280/464 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]