Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 751  |
|  Robert Wolfe to Rob Swindell  |
|  Re: Pipe Color Code Translation  |
|  03 Feb 19 19:23:16  |
 On Feb 03, 2019 03:18pm, Rob Swindell wrote to Robert Wolfe: RS> Re: Pipe Color Code Translation RS> By: Robert Wolfe to All on Sun Feb 03 2019 12:35 pm >> So, passed the following idea along to Santronics this afternoon re:pipe >> color codes: >> >> "I was wondering if you would consider pipe color codes to @-code >> translation on >> import in PXECHO/PXMAIL? There are lots of Mystic boards on the networks >> these days and a lot of their users post using their software native pipe >> codes for color. I was wondering if, when importing messages, >> PXMAIL/ECHO >> could check for >> "Mystic BBS" in the @TID line in the message header and translate the >> color >> pipe >> codes properly before putting them into the message database?" RS> That seems like a weird place to do the translation (in the tosser). RS> What if you have a network of Mystic systems with a Wildcat! hub? Would RS> the Wildcat! hub have to convert all colors codes back to pipe-codes RS> before sending to the Mystic nodes? And what if some of the nodes RS> weren't running Mystic? The hub would have to know what software was in RS> use at all times for each node to convert color codes correctly. Seems RS> like a mess to me. Well, it was just an idea. :) I know that it does the same thing for PCBoard @-codes. But, again, just an idea, just a starting point. Nothing else. ... Robert Wolfe |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]