Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 234  |
|  Tommi Koivula to Wilfred van Velzen  |
|  WInPoint Beta 6 Available  |
|  09 Jan 22 15:03:44  |
 MSGID: 2:221/1.2 1b6fb504 CHRS: UTF-8 4 TZUTC: 0200 REPLY: 2:280/464 61dad727 Hello Wilfred, WvV> Hi Tim, WvV> On 2022-01-09 09:43:37, Carlos Navarro wrote to you: CN>> @MSGID: 2:341/234.5 1ae45e8f CN>> @REPLY: 2:240/1120.29 0648a602 WvV> ... CN>> --- WinPoint 382.0 CN>> * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin (2:341/234.5) CN>> CN> CN> @PATH: 341/234 280/464 WvV> I think there is something broken in this version. The time field of the WvV> message in the pkt file contained this, when it arrived here directly WvV> from Carlos: WvV> "09 ene. 22 09:43:37" Enero, january in spanish. :) WvV> This probably confused some tossers along the way, because through WvV> another route I got this in my log for this message: WvV> 10:53:48.582 Pkt info: HPT 1.9, Type 2+, 895, 2022-01-09 10:53:01, Pwd, WvV> Sec WvV> 10:53:48.582 Error in pkt date: 00 00 00:00:00 WvV> This confused my tosser so bad it ended up in my netmail, with the WvV> header fields mangled up, and no body text... Yes, one bad "netmail" at 2:221/1 from your system too.. The english version of WP seems to work fine. 'Tommi --- WinPoint 382.0 * Origin: Not the Original WinPoint Origin! (2:221/1.2) SEEN-BY: 15/0 30/0 106/201 153/7715 203/0 221/1 6 360 229/110 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 664 700 240/1120 266/512 280/464 282/464 1038 292/854 SEEN-BY: 301/0 1 101 113 320/219 335/364 341/66 396/45 423/81 712/848 SEEN-BY: 920/1 5020/1042 5058/104 PATH: 221/1 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]