Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 307  |
|  Tim Schattkowsky to Carlos Navarro  |
|  Re: IBMPC vs CP437  |
|  19 Jan 22 22:23:40  |
 MSGID: 2:240/1120.29 223b5487 CHRS: IBMPC 2 TZUTC: 0100 REPLY: 2:341/234.5 222a0308 //Hello Carlos,// on *19.01.22* at *20:42:50* You wrote in rea *WINPOINT* to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"IBMPC vs CP437"*. CN> Not a high priority issue, but I suggest you change the IBMPC charset CN> identifier to CP437. See "5. Obsolete identifiers" in FTS-5003 for more CN> info. http://ftsc.org/docs/fts-5003.001 Nope. I think IBMPC is more compatible. Still, WP itself recognizes both. Regards, Tim --- WinPoint 393.0 * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29) SEEN-BY: 15/0 30/0 106/201 129/330 153/7715 221/1 6 229/110 317 426 SEEN-BY: 229/428 664 700 240/1120 266/512 280/464 282/464 1038 291/100 SEEN-BY: 292/854 301/0 1 101 113 317/3 320/219 335/364 341/66 371/0 SEEN-BY: 396/45 712/848 920/1 2452/250 3634/12 5020/1042 5058/104 PATH: 240/1120 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]