Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 478  |
|  Tommi Koivula to Tim Schattkowsky  |
|  netmail  |
|  16 Feb 22 08:00:17  |
 MSGID: 2:221/360.0 620c92ea REPLY: 2:240/1120.29 3463732e PID: TripleD/OS2 1.3 20220108 TID: GE/32 1.2 BBSID: RBB CHRS: UTF-8 4 TZUTC: 0200 On 15.2.2022 23.01, Tim Schattkowsky wrote: > TK>> @INTL 2:0/0 2:221/6 > TK>> @FMPT 256 > TK>> @MSGID: 2:221/6.256 343d5283 > TK>> @CHRS: IBMPC 2 > TK>> @TZUTC: 0200 > TK>> @PID: WinPoint 398.2 > TK>> ping > > TK> August, this is what may have happened to your areafix message that > TK> bounced. > > Scary. Any background on this? August sent a request to my areafix. It was bounced because it was to "2:0/0", not to "2:221/1". I tried to send netmail from my WP point to "ping" and I noticed that it is possible to send netmail without entering the address. The netmail was also to "2:0/0" as you see above. Of course this is user error but WP might check the sanity of the address. :) 'Tommi --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.0 * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0) SEEN-BY: 15/0 30/0 106/201 129/331 153/7715 203/0 221/1 6 360 229/110 SEEN-BY: 229/317 426 428 664 700 240/1120 266/512 280/464 282/464 SEEN-BY: 282/1038 292/854 301/0 1 101 113 317/3 320/219 335/364 341/66 SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/81 460/58 712/848 920/1 5020/1042 5058/104 PATH: 221/360 1 301/1 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]