Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 680  |
|  Wilfred van Velzen to Tim Schattkowsky  |
|  Re: WinPoint Version 404 IPV5  |
|  11 Mar 22 09:31:29  |
 TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes TZUTC: 0100 CHRS: UTF-8 2 PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221 MSGID: 2:280/464 622b09d7 REPLY: 2:240/1120.29 46810783 Hi Tim, On 2022-03-10 23:01:40, you wrote to Michiel van der Vlist: TS> Well, as long as I have no indication that the result order of the OS TS> returned has any semantics at all (rather than beeing random) relying TS> on itmay worse than making an enducated guess. If you know some place TS> that defines that the order is actually a suggestion on priorities TS> that would be fine. It took some google-ing, but I got your answer. There is an extensive RFC written about this subject: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3484.txt (See paragraph 10.3 if you are in a hurry ;-)) Windows implements this RFC: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/net orking/configure-ipv6-in-windows Bye, Wilfred. --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815 * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464) SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 129/331 153/757 7715 203/0 218/700 SEEN-BY: 221/0 229/110 317 426 428 664 700 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 SEEN-BY: 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 341/234 SEEN-BY: 396/45 460/58 712/848 770/1 2452/250 PATH: 280/464 712/848 229/426 |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]