MSGID: 2:240/1120.29 8cefcf84
CHRS: IBMPC 2
TZUTC: 0200
REPLY: 2:240/1120@fidonet 62ac5b73
//Hello Ulrich,//

on *17.06.22* at *10:45:41* You wrote in Area *WINPOINT*
to *Tim Schattkowsky* about *"Re: Problem ipv6 vs ipv4"*.

 US> ,5555,Nieuw_Schnoord,Driebergen,Michiel_van_der_Vlist,-Unpublished-,300,M
 US> N,CM,MO,XW,IBN:fido.vlist.eu,IBN:fido4to6.vlis
 US> t.eu,PING,TRACE,U,ENC,RPK,NPK,NC

 US> and here you can find the related FQDNs
 US> I would give it a try with these 2 listed FQDNs

Oh. So is this whole IPv4/IPv6 discussion here about the idea that WP should
try the other entry from the nodelist? 

Regards,
Tim

--- WinPoint 408.3
 * Origin: Original WinPoint Origin! (2:240/1120.29)
SEEN-BY: 15/0 106/201 124/5016 129/331 153/757 7715 203/0 221/0 1
SEEN-BY: 221/6 229/110 111 112 113 317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120
SEEN-BY: 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1
SEEN-BY: 301/113 310/31 317/3 320/219 335/364 341/66 234 371/0 396/45
SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 3634/12 5020/1042 5058/104
PATH: 240/1120 301/1 280/464 712/848 229/426